Healthy Debates




Issue: Stigma as a Barrier to Mental Health Care
5/14/2009 -

Many service members who need and deserve proper mental health care fear negative consequences or perceptions and take no action to seek treatment. Troops struggling with stress, anxiety, or depression may not visit a mental health care provider because they think their buddies or command will treat them differently for doing so. Some may not realize that they may have a problem. This stigma persists as a barrier to providing help to those who need mental health care in all populations, not just in the military.

There is no shame in seeking help. Many military leaders have come forward to talk about their own experiences with post-traumatic stress or depression and how they have benefitted from help they have received. A wealth of mental health programs and services have been created by DoD and partnering organizations.

Is this enough in a military environment? Has DoD taken the right approach in addressing this issue? What programs and resources are working? Which ones aren’t working? What will it take to convince service members that they will see no negative consequence as a result of seeking mental health care?

Please keep in mind that this forum is used to debate DoD health policy and operational issues. Your comments will be passed along to MHS senior leaders for their consideration.

Mental health information and resources are available at www.health.mil/mentalhealth.


We expect that participants will treat each other with respect. All comments will be reviewed before posting. We will not post comments that contain vulgar language; personal attacks of any kind; or offensive terms that target specific groups. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain on-topic.


Rating: 

Return To Debates
 
Comments are now closed. Thank you for your participation.
(View in Threaded Format)
Comments (15)
»
2
1
Page 1 of 2
Cecily david at 2009-05-14 14:16:57 wrote:

Continue to educate that it is OK to seek help for mental health issues . Culture needs to change. It is OK for grown men to cry .
MAJ Remington Nevin at 2009-05-15 02:55:14 wrote:

The current paradigm for mental health and the focus on “stigma” conveniently shifts the burden of responsibility to the service member, while ignoring contradictory institutional ethos, such as the Army Values' emphasis on "selfless service", which every Army recruit understands requires placing "the welfare of the nation, the Army, and your subordinates before your own".

Variations of this ethos are found across all the services, are teach the importance of loyalty to one's unit and the mission above all other considerations, including health. This ethos is strongly at odds with the recent emphasis on self-referral and self-identification for mental health care, particularly if a service member reasonably anticipates that such action will render him or her to be found unsuitable for a deployment. These actions would be viewed as weakening the unit, increasing the risk to one's comrades.
The current epidemic of suicides among the Army ranks is clearly related to deployment; and is very likely related to the repeated deployment of individuals at increased risk of suicidi through pre-existing mental health problems.

Yet DoD is continuing to deploy thousands of such personnel, many on multiple tours; many of whom are on multiple psychotropic medications; and many of whom have a consistent history of treatment and counseling which ends or is interrupted immediately upon deployment.

Many of these personnel would have been clearly disqualified for deployment in prior years; but current operational considerations and the needs of the services have overruled such medical caution.

Until DoD admits that reliance on self-report of mental health problems is at odds with its core ethos, the current epidemic of suicides will likely continue unabated.

In the interim, DoD should commit to the letter and spirit of Public Law requiring comprehensive medical examinations prior to deployment (as opposed to ineffective Pre-Deployment Health Assessments); and clarify whether physicians do indeed have the independent authority to identify a service member as "non-deployable", not subject to being overruled by commanders whose interests must realistically be focused primarily on operational considerations, not the health of individual service members.
harry gonzalez at 2009-05-22 15:08:45 wrote:

I can appreciate the importance of self-advocacy and seeking professional help. Throughout my long-road I have informed my command as to my progress and prognosis, never knowing their intentions. Foolishly I trusted them. I retire in Mar 2010.

Keep your friends close, keep your superiors closer...

This is the unedited reality.

hg
Tracy Connor at 2009-05-26 15:18:28 wrote:

The message that there is no shame in seeking mental health care is not enough. As described very well in MAJ Nevin's 5/15 post, the military ethos is one of prioritizing self care below selfless service. The message needs to be that a servicemember who recognizes in him/herself a need for mental health treatment has a duty, a responsibility on par with his or her other duty obligations, to seek mental health care as needed. The unit, mission, service branch, and nation are not actually served by individuals with mental health conditions foregoing care. Also as pointed out by MAJ Nevin, the onus for referral can not fall only on the individual. Educated, experienced, worldly adults often are unable to identify a need for mental heath care in themselves. To expect a group of people who are under extraordinary strains in several life domains (and are often young, without functional family support, and early in their educations)to self identify just asks for trouble. Personnel in leadership positions at all levels need to be trained to recognize and skillfully intervene and refer servicemembers for care. I know a handful of USMC Majors who currently hold or recently held leadership positions (e.g. Battery CO) who remain entirely unfamiliar with the mental health resources available to their Marines. Civilian non-profits are abuzz with the lack of communication and confusion and are looking to create simple, accessible, one-point referral for mental health care. The DoD and the service branches should be embarrassed that they have not already met this need. I have heard repeatedly that Onesource is the place to go for that; however, I challenge anyone who does not know exactly for what they are looking to find comprehensive information on Onesource/Tricare/MHS websites -- internet research savvy people in perfect mental and physical health would have trouble.
Melinda at 2009-06-03 09:54:18 wrote:

As a person who has gone for help I have a lot to say on this subject.

I had suicidal Ideation at the time only I was new to my unit so nobody knew what my normal behaviors were. One thing my new command did know was that my Mom died 2 months before my arrival because when my commander at Keesler requested to extend my report no later than date because my mom was dying it was declined. Keesler was home for me. My mom died only a few days later. The only time I took off of work was the holidays because I assumed I had to go back then. While in the middle of grieving for my mom and trying to get my Dad used to doing things for himself I had to PCS. My new Supervisor put me to work the morning after I arrived. I didn't even get time off the recieve my household goods. Things just got worse for me very quickly. I had a plan to just make it all go away. My kids noticed I wasn't right and asked if they did something that made me sad all the time. I decided to go for help at the Lifeskills clinic.

After I made my first appointment I decided that I should let my supervisor and commander know I was going. I didn't give a reason other than I wasn't dealing with my moms death very well. I just thought it was the responsible thing to do.

Before I told them I was trained to go TDY for special support for the launch of the Space Shuttle. My AEF was coming up and I was happy I finally would be able to deploy since I had never gone.

After I told them I became the trouble Airman. I went from absolutely no disciplinary actions in my file except for fitness to 2 years later having 2 LORs and 3 LOCs. I also have recieved 2 - 3 EPRS even though I am in charge of our Unit Safety/ORM which recieved positive comments from our ORI and consistently is praised by the safety office as the best they've ever seen. I turned in 2-3 pages of good bullets each year for absolutely no reason. I have ratings of 3 on two EPRs and was told my next one would probably be a 2. I worked harder and accomplished more during this assignment than any other. I will be Medically retired in July partly due to the way I was treated by my chain of command while trying to recover from a major depression and PTSD which I think was triggered by seeing my mom die. I will not recieve the honors of retirement after 19 years and 4 months of service. Yes I get to retire but without ceremony and with no medals. People tell me I served honorably but I feel no honor in being treated as a criminal for seeking medical treatment for Depression and other problems.

It took me a long time but my point is....If it is a good thing to ask for help, why do we treat people who do it as if they are less than everyone else? How can you justify treating someone who was responsible enough to get help like the are incompetent after years of proving they are very capable and competent? It should raise a red flag when someone getting treatment suddenly starts getting disciplinary actions and substandard ratings. Shouldn't the chain of command be held accountable for making life almost unbearable for people who are already thinking life isn't worth living. Discipline does not correct mental health issues it aggravates them.
During the time I was at my lowest after I told not one person including my supervisor asked how I was or if there was anything they could do to help. Instead of making me feel like I was a person of worth I was made to feel underserving and worthless. I wanted to finish my career honorably at 20+ years and I don't even get that. I tried to help by telling my story but noone wanted to listen because I am overweight. I have to say I find it very disappointing that people veiw someones weight problem as more critical than the possibility of saving just one airman. Suicides will never decrease in the Air Force until the chain of command realizes discipline isn't the answer ...It is a last resort....Care and understanding is the answer I have done my duty by talking to my chain of command and people in my squadron. It is a shame no one listened.
Sam at 2009-06-04 09:53:58 wrote:

Concerning suicide prevention I have two recommendations that I believe would have an immediate impact.

1. At a minimum, implement a satellite program relocating non-married military members residing in the barracks that currently reside in three and four person rooms, into an open squad bay environment with assigned Non commissioned officers. During the early 1980 and before in the military, this was standard policy in all the branches of the US military and it prevented and saved thousands of lives from potential suicide and countless other potential behavior problems, wise and savvy NCO’s had an eyes on approach to the health and welfare of their junior military members and could determine and prevent many potential mental health problem before they got out of control. In today’s military, NCO are not billeted anywhere near their junior military members and I believe this situation has created a lack of leadership environment, that could easily be prevented with greater direct contact. I understand this would not be a very popular solution in today’s military, but I believe the ends justify the means.

2. Effective immediately! All military members who seek military legal assistance for separation or divorce must also receive a mental heath screening. If this becomes mandatory, it will automatically remove the sigma and or dogma of being portrayed as weak or inferior to their chain of command or individual peers.
Louis Edward Buckingham at 2009-06-12 16:41:58 wrote:

When you have completed all of the things that kept you busy over the years since Vietnam. You no longer surrounded by the Vets, you use to work with. All you have now is your war room at home. You need more things to do to keep your mind focus. I now have to much time to think about the war and its experiences. I will continue to focus on high energy although I can't stay still long enough, because I must be doing something. I will try this Vet groups near my home for assitance.
melissia wilson at 2009-06-16 21:18:27 wrote:

this is a very huge issue for the military. I have seen first hand the issues that a soldier faces when he is in a vulnerable position, or state of mind if you will. I don't know if it is becuause of lack of enough care givers or qualified personel or just that it is a medical condition that has only been given the recognition as a true medical condition in recent years. My family member has faced serious issues that are most certainly a medical condition. My entire family spends alot of time feeling that there is nothing that we can do to help our own flesh and blood who is in desperate need of help. It seems as though our hands are tied and our soldier is left to try to work his/her way through a system that doesn't seem to have a place for these kinds of issues. I am greatful to see that this is a subject that others are talking about and trying to figure out. I wish I knew where to get more information.

Sincerely,

Desperate in Texas
Julie at 2009-06-24 14:20:47 wrote:

I encourage all members suffering from a mental illness from whatever circumstance to utilize their local Mental Health Clinic. The brain is an organ just at the heart, liver, kidneys, etc. are and it can have problems just as the other organs can. It is "OK" to get help for your mental well-being. I saw a psychologist for many years while AD and am grateful for all the help I received.
Richard Moczygemba, COL, MC (Ret.) at 2009-06-26 17:41:16 wrote:

The current doublespeak is that "commanders may not discourage" personnel from seeking help for mental or emotional problems. There is no regulation requiring commanders to refer troops to seek mental health assistance for mental or emotional problems. Until there is regulatory language that clearly spells out what commanders must do for troops with these problems, nothing will change. There also needs to be regulatory language that spells out the requirement for troops to be allowed to engage in any and all treatment modalities, and for mental health profiles to have iron-clad protection from modification or violation.
Until someone at the four star level makes it clear that prejudice and stigmatization will not be tolerated, it will continue to be tolerated. I am tired of seeing the general officers make toothless statements with the usual platitudes, when the leadership clearly has the power to make the change happen.
The culture change will have to be ordered, mandated, and enforced, much like racial integration of the military in 1948, or it won't happen.
»
2
1
Page 1 of 2