Skip Navigation Skip to Sitemap
MHS Blog

Go Back

So What Exactly Is Human Performance Optimization?

An exact definition of Human Performance Optimization is like the abominable snowman: never captured and witness details vary. However, two of my colleagues and I mounted an expedition to capture the slippery beast and published a paper in the Summer 2009 Air and Space Power Journal entitled “Managing the Human Weapon System: A Vision for an Air Force Human-Performance Doctrine.” We laid out for full public view three aspects of human performance: sustainment, optimization, and enhancement. Human performance sustainment maintains defined target performance levels throughout a career; optimization efficiently uses limited human resources through the process of Human Systems Integration (HSI); and enhancement takes the human beyond established and sustainable performance thresholds, most commonly through science and technology research.

Human Performance Optimization month logoWhy, you may ask, should I care about a human performance yeti? Well, unless you have been living in a 1950s nuclear fallout shelter, you can appreciate the rapid advances in technology, from iPhone 4 to cars with integrated GPS, computers, and Bluetooth. In the military, advanced technology coupled with complex, network-centric systems places high demand on physical and cognitive resources while maintaining situational awareness. If, for example, demand has sapped a fighter pilot’s cognitive reserve, the mission may have to be aborted, or the weapon may miss the target, or, even worse, there may be nothing but a smoking hole in the ground. So it’s vital to integrate the human into systems, to define human performance capabilities in order to sustain the warrior throughout a career, and to assess them periodically to make sure they are still up to performance standards. To that end, the Military Health System plays a critical role in maintaining superior performance.

But there is a lingering problem: the military services are desperately in need of sound human performance doctrine and human performance practitioners. In fact, I would go so far as to say that the MHS paradigm must shift to one of human performance rather than a health model. Although health is a prerequisite for performance, the presence of health does not guarantee performance. We excel in caring for the wounded warrior – now we must excel in sustaining, optimizing, and enhancing the warrior. Through performance enhancement research, human systems integration, and a health system that sustains human performance, the American soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine can effectively and efficiently execute the mission.

Listen to Col. Brown discuss Human Performance Optimization on the Dot Mil Docs podcast.

 

5 Comments »

Robert Lindberg said:
9/9/2010 3:05:15 PM
Simply Human Performance consists of essentially two components: Readiness and Mission Success in order to derive the human component of Mission Effectiveness within a Total System Performance context. From a Mission Effectiveness perspective, Human Performance is the arrival of fit, healthy, qualified, and rest people who are resourced, motivated, vigilant, and efficient while accomplishing mission objectives anywhere in the world. In order to achieve Mission Effectiveness, Readiness and Mission Success Factors come into play. Readiness Factors are accounted for through Availability: having enough people with the right knowledge, skills, abilities, health and motivation with the right qualifications who are rested and protected (in other words Fully Mission Capable comes into mind). Whereas, Mission Success Factors are derived through Process Efficiency: Sufficiently resourced, motivated people with the appropriate methods, decisions, or policies who are efficient and vigilant at accomplishing mission objects.
Bob Lindberg said:
8/23/2010 1:25:32 PM
Understanding Human Performance is really not terribly difficult when one considers that "Human Performance is the arrival of fit, healthy, qualified, and rested people who are resourced, motivated, vigilant, and efficient in accomplishing mission objectives anywhere in the world with the ability to depart, recover, and reconstitute themselves and their technology. Furthermore, Human Performance requires enough people with the right knowledge, skills, abilities, and morale with the right fitness, health, and motivation with the right qualifications who are rested and protected.
Col Lex Brown said:
8/4/2010 3:18:22 PM
mh actually brings up a good point by stating, "it sounds like resistance is futile and we are going to be borgs." Another paper we published in the Air & Space Power Journal (Winter 2008) entitled "Human Performance Enhancement: Uberhumans or Ethical Morass" explores the ethical issues surrounding human performance enhancement. With current strides in nano-, bio-, info-, and cogno-technologies (NBIC), the possibility of integrating hardware/software into humans could be around the proverbial corner. It is incumbent upon the DoD to be ethically prepared for this, or it may well be that resistance becomes futile.
ranadiya said:
7/24/2010 5:44:08 AM
yes i agree with you that human systems integration is very much needed to enhancing the warrior. Really great blog i come accorss first time.
mh said:
7/22/2010 10:44:16 AM
i still dont understand it, but then again the very first computer i ever saw was so large it took up half of a wing in a building and a modem was literally a dial phone reciever cradled into a box so maybe i am just too old ;)
it sounds like resistance is futile and we are going to be borgs?

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled for this entry.