Back to Top Skip to main content Skip to sub-navigation

Update: Heat Illness, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2018

Image of Drink water the day before and during physical activity or if heat is going to become a factor. (Photo Courtesy: U.S. Air Force). Click to open a larger version of the image. Drink water the day before and during physical activity or if heat is going to become a factor. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

ABSTRACT

In 2018, there were 578 incident diagnoses of heat stroke and 2,214 incident diagnoses of heat exhaustion among active component service members. The overall crude incidence rates of heat stroke and heat exhaustion diagnoses were 0.45 cases and 1.71 cases per 1,000 person-years, respectively. In 2018, subgroup-specific rates of incident heat stroke diagnoses were highest among males and service members less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Marine Corps and Army members, recruit trainees, and those in combat-specific occupations. Subgroup-specific incidence rates of heat exhaustion diagnoses in 2018 were notably higher among service members less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Army and Marine Corps members, recruit trainees, and service members in combat-specific occupations. During 2014–2018, a total of 325 heat illnesses were documented among service members in Iraq and Afghanistan; 8.6% (n=28) were diagnosed as heat stroke. Commanders, small unit leaders, training cadre, and supporting medical personnel must ensure that the military members whom they supervise and support are informed about the risks, preventive countermeasures, early signs and symptoms, and first-responder actions related to heat illnesses.

WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS?    

Annual rates of incident heat stroke diagnoses increased steadily between 2014 and 2018. During the same period, the annual incidence rate of heat exhaustion diagnoses peaked in 2018. A sizable proportion of heat stroke and heat exhaustion cases identified through records of ambulatory visits did not prompt mandatory reports through the Reportable Medical Events System.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON READINESS AND FORCE HEALTH PROTECTION?

Heat illnesses can degrade U.S. military effectiveness by causing considerable morbidity, particularly during training of recruits and of soldiers and Marines in combat arms specialties. Complete and timely submission of mandatory reports of heat illness events ensures that local public health and command leaders have ready access to real-time surveillance data to identify trends and to guide preventive measures.

BACKGROUND

Heat illness refers to a group of disorders that occur when the elevation of core body temperature surpasses the compensatory limits of thermoregulation.1 Heat illness is the result of environmental heat stress and/or exertion and represents a set of conditions that exist along a continuum from less severe (heat exhaustion) to potentially life threatening (heat stroke).

Heat exhaustion is caused by the inability to maintain adequate cardiac output because of strenuous physical exertion and environmental heat stress.1,2 Acute dehydration often accompanies heat exhaustion but is not required for the diagnosis.3 The clinical criteria for heat exhaustion include a core body temperature greater than 100.5ºF/38ºC and less than 104ºF/40ºC at the time of or immediately after exertion and/or heat exposure, physical collapse at the time of or shortly after physical exertion, and no significant dysfunction of the central nervous system. If any central nervous system dysfunction develops with heat exhaustion (e.g., dizziness or headache), it is mild and rapidly resolves with rest and cooling measures (e.g., removal of unnecessary clothing, relocation to a cooled environment, and oral hydration with cooled, slightly hypotonic solutions).1–4

Heat stroke is a debilitating illness characterized clinically by severe hyperthermia (i.e., a core body temperature of 104ºF/40ºC or greater), profound central nervous system dysfunction (e.g., delirium, seizures, or coma), and additional organ and tissue damage.1,4,5 The onset of heat stroke requires aggressive clinical treatments, including rapid cooling and supportive therapies such as fluid resuscitation to stabilize organ function.1,5 The observed pathologic changes in several organ systems are thought to occur through a complex interaction between heat cytotoxicity, coagulopathies, and a severe systemic inflammatory response.1,5 Multi-organ system failure is the ultimate cause of mortality due to heat stroke.5

Timely medical intervention can prevent milder cases of heat illness (e.g., heat exhaustion) from becoming severe (e.g., heat stroke) and potentially life threatening. However, even with medical intervention, heat stroke may have lasting effects, including damage to the nervous system and other vital organs and decreased heat tolerance, making an individual more susceptible to subsequent episodes of heat illness.6–8 Furthermore, the continued manifestation of multi-organ system dysfunction after heat stroke increases patients’ risk of mortality during the ensuing months and years.9,10

Strenuous physical activity for extended durations in occupational settings as well as during military operational and training exercises exposes service members to considerable heat stress because of high environmental heat and/or a high rate of metabolic heat production.11 In some military settings, wearing needed protective clothing or equipment may make it biophysically difficult to dissipate body heat. The resulting body heat burden and associated cardiovascular strain reduce exercise performance and increase the risk of heat-related illness.11,12

Over many decades, lessons learned during military training and operations in hot environments as well as a substantial body of literature have resulted in doctrine, equipment, and preventive measures that can significantly reduce the adverse health effects of military activities in hot weather.13–19 Although numerous effective countermeasures are available, heat-related illness remains a significant threat to the health and operational effectiveness of military members and their units and accounts for considerable morbidity, particularly during recruit training in the U.S. military.11,20

In the U.S. Military Health System (MHS), the most serious types of heat-related illness are considered notifiable medical events. Notifiable cases of heat illness include heat exhaustion and heat stroke. All cases of heat illness that require medical intervention or result in change of duty status are reportable.4

This report summarizes reportable medical events of heat illness as well as heat illness-related hospitalizations and ambulatory visits among active component service members during 2018 and compares them to the previous 4 years. Episodes of heat stroke and heat exhaustion are summarized separately.

METHODS

The surveillance period was 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2018. The surveillance population included all individuals who served in the active component of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps at any time during the surveillance period. All data used to determine incident heat illness diagnoses were derived from records routinely maintained in the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS). These records document both ambulatory encounters and hospitalizations of active component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces in fixed military and civilian (if reimbursed through the MHS) treatment facilities worldwide. In-theater diagnoses of heat illness were identified from medical records of service members deployed to Southwest Asia or the Middle East and whose healthcare encounters were documented in the Theater Medical Data Store (TMDS). Because heat illnesses represent a threat to the health of individual service members and to military training and operations, the Armed Forces require expeditious reporting of these reportable medical events through any of the service-specific electronic reporting systems; these reports are routinely transmitted and incorporated into the DMSS.

For this analysis, a case of heat illness was defined as an individual with 1) a hospitalization or outpatient medical encounter with a primary (first-listed) or secondary (second-listed) diagnosis of heat stroke (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision [ICD-9]: 992.0; International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10]: T67.0*) or heat exhaustion (ICD-9: 992.3–992.5; ICD-10: T67.3*–T67.5*) or 2) a reportable medical event record of heat exhaustion or heat stroke.21 Because of an update to the Disease Reporting System internet (DRSi) medical event reporting system in July 2017, the type of reportable medical events for heat illness (i.e., heat stroke or heat exhaustion) could not be distinguished using reportable medical event records in DMSS data. Instead, information on the type of reportable medical event for heat illness during the entire 2014–2018 surveillance period was extracted from the DRSi by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) Army Satellite and Army Public Health Center Staff.

It is important to note that previous MSMR analyses included diagnosis codes for other and unspecified effects of heat and light (ICD-9: 992.8 and 992.9; ICD-10: T67.8* and T67.9*) within the heat illness category “other heat illnesses.” These codes were excluded from the current analysis and the April 2018 MSMR analysis. If an individual had a diagnosis for both heat stroke and heat exhaustion during a given year, only 1 diagnosis was selected, prioritizing heat stroke over heat exhaustion. Encounters for each individual within each calendar year then were prioritized in terms of record source, with hospitalizations prioritized over reportable events, which were prioritized over ambulatory visits.

For surveillance purposes, a “recruit trainee” was defined as an active component service member (grades E1–E4) who was assigned to 1 of the services’ 9 recruit training locations (per the individual’s initial military personnel record). For this report, each service member was considered a recruit trainee for the period corresponding to the usual length of recruit training in his or her service. Recruit trainees were considered a separate category of enlisted service members in summaries of heat illnesses by military grade overall.

Records of medical evacuations from the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR) (e.g., Iraq or Afghanistan) to a medical treatment facility outside the CENTCOM AOR were analyzed separately. Evacuations were considered case defining if affected service members had at least 1 inpatient or outpatient heat illness medical encounter in a permanent military medical facility in the U.S. or Europe from 5 days before to 10 days after their evacuation dates. 

Medical data from military treatment facilities that are using MHS GENESIS are not available in the DMSS, which was implemented at different sites throughout 2017. These sites include Naval Hospital Oak Harbor, Naval Hospital Bremerton, Air Force Medical Services Fairchild, and Madigan Army Medical Center. Therefore, medical encounter data for individuals seeking care at any of these facilities during 2017–2018 were not included in this analysis.

RESULTS

In 2018, there were 578 incident cases of heat stroke and 2,214 incident cases of heat exhaustion among active component service members (Table 1). The crude overall incidence rates of heat stroke and heat exhaustion diagnoses were 0.45 cases and 1.71 cases per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs), respectively. In 2018, subgroup-specific incidence rates of heat stroke diagnoses were highest among males, those less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Marine Corps and Army members, recruit trainees, and those in combat-specific occupations (Table 1). The rate of incident heat stroke diagnoses was 20.9% higher among service members in the Marine Corps than among those in the Army; the Army rate was more than 7-fold the Navy rate and 9-fold the Air Force rate; and the rate among females was 26.5% lower than the rate among males. There were only 37 cases of heat stroke reported among recruit trainees, but their incidence rate was more than 3 times that of other enlisted members and officers.

Similar to the heat stroke findings, the crude overall incidence rate of heat exhaustion diagnoses among males was slightly higher than among females (Table 1). In 2018, subgroup-specific rates of incident heat exhaustion diagnoses were notably higher among service members less than 20 years old, Asian/Pacific Islanders, Army and Marine Corps members, recruit trainees, and service members in combat-specific occupations.

Crude (unadjusted) annual incidence rates of heat stroke diagnoses increased steadily from 0.26 cases per 1,000 p-yrs in 2014 to 0.45 cases per 1,000 p-yrs in 2018 (Figure 1). In 2018, there were more heat stroke-related hospitalizations and reportable medical events than in 2017 but similar numbers of ambulatory visits. Crude annual rates of incident heat exhaustion diagnoses increased steadily during the first 3 years of the surveillance period and ranged from a low of 1.12 cases per 1,000 p-yrs in 2014 to 1.42 cases per 1,000 p-yrs in 2016 (Figure 2). Annual rates were stable during 2016–2017 and then increased 18.7% to a peak of 1.71 cases per 1,000 p-yrs in 2018. During the 5-year surveillance period, the numbers of heat exhaustion-related hospitalizations and the proportions they represented remained relatively stable (range: 49–65; 2.7%–3.4%). However, the proportions of of total heat exhaustion cases from reportable medical events increased from 29.5% in 2014 to 40.1% in 2018, while the proportions from ambulatory visits decreased from 66.3% to 57.0% during this period.

Heat illnesses by location

During the 5-year surveillance period, a total of 11,452 heat-related illnesses were diagnosed at more than 250 military installations and geographic locations worldwide (Table 2). Less than 8% of the total heat illness cases occurred outside of the U.S. (n=831). Four Army installations accounted for slightly more than one-third (34.2%) of all heat illnesses during the period (Fort Benning, GA [n=1,504]; Fort Bragg, NC [n=1,108]; Fort Campbell, KY [n=694]; and Fort Polk, LA [n=610]). Six other locations accounted for an additional one-quarter (24.8%) of heat illness events (Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune/Cherry Point, NC [n=738]; Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island/Beaufort, SC [n=580]; Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA [n=496]); Naval Medical Center San Diego, CA [n=429]; Okinawa, Japan [n=299]; and Fort Jackson, SC [n=298]). Of these 10 locations with the most heat illness events, 7 are located in the southeastern U.S. The 19 locations with more than 100 cases of heat illness accounted for nearly three-quarters (73.0%) of all active component cases during 2014–2018.

Heat illnesses in Iraq and Afghanistan 

During the 5-year surveillance period, a total of 325 heat illnesses were diagnosed and treated in Iraq and Afghanistan (Figure 3). Of the total cases of heat illness, 8.6% (n=28) were diagnosed as heat stroke. Deployed service members who were affected by heat illnesses were most frequently male (n=270; 83.1%); non-Hispanic white (n=196; 60.3%); 20–24 years old (n=176; 54.2%); in the Army (n=173; 53.2%); enlisted (n=315; 96.9%); and in repair/engineering (n=109; 33.5%) or combat-specific (n=98; 30.2%) occupations (data not shown). During the surveillance period, 4 service members were medically evacuated for heat illnesses from Iraq or Afghanistan; all of the evacuations took place in the summer months (May–September).

EDITORIAL COMMENT

This annual update of heat illnesses among service members in the active component documented that the unadjusted annual rates of incident heat stroke diagnoses increased steadily between 2014 and 2018. The crude annual incidence rate of heat exhaustion diagnoses in 2018 represents an 18.7% increase over the 2017 rate.

There are significant limitations to this update that should be considered when interpreting the results. Similar heat-related clinical illnesses are likely managed differently and reported with different diagnostic codes at different locations and in different clinical settings. Such differences undermine the validity of direct comparisons of rates of nominal heat stroke and heat exhaustion events across locations and settings. Also, heat illnesses during training exercises and deployments that are treated in field medical facilities may not be captured in this report. In addition, it should be noted that the guidelines for mandatory reporting of heat illnesses were modified in the 2017 revision of the Armed Forces guidelines and case definitions for reportable medical events.4 In this updated version of the guidelines and case definitions, the heat injury category was removed, leaving only case classifications for heat stroke and heat exhaustion. To compensate for such possible variation in reporting, the analysis for this update, as in previous years, included cases identified in DMSS records of ambulatory care and hospitalizations using a consistent set of ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for the entire surveillance period. However, it also is important to note that the exclusion of diagnosis codes for other and unspecified effects of heat and light (formerly included within the heat illness category “other heat illnesses”) in the current analysis precludes the direct comparison of numbers and rates of cases of heat exhaustion to the numbers and rates of “other heat illnesses” reported in MSMR updates prior to 2017.

As has been noted in previous MSMR heat illness updates, results indicate that a sizable proportion of cases identified through DMSS records of ambulatory visits did not prompt mandatory reports through the reporting system.20 However, this study did not directly ascertain the overlap between hospitalizations and reportable events and the overlap between reportable events and outpatient encounters. It is possible that cases of heat illness, whether diagnosed during an inpatient or outpatient encounter, were not documented as reportable medical events because treatment providers were not attentive to the criteria for reporting or because of ambiguity in interpreting the criteria (e.g., the heat illness did not result in a change in duty status or the core body temperature measured during/immediately after exertion or heat exposure was not available). Underreporting is especially concerning for cases of heat stroke because it may reflect insufficient attentiveness to the need for prompt recognition of cases of this dangerous illness and for timely intervention at the local level to prevent additional cases.

In spite of its limitations, this report documents that heat illnesses are a significant and persistent threat to both the health of U.S. military members and the effectiveness of military operations. Of all military members, the youngest and most inexperienced Marines and soldiers (particularly those training at installations in the southeastern U.S.) are at highest risk of heat illnesses, including heat stroke, exertional hyponatremia, and exertional rhabdomyolysis (see the other articles in this issue of the MSMR).

Commanders, small unit leaders, training cadre, and supporting medical personnel—particularly at recruit training centers and installations with large combat troop populations—must ensure that the military members whom they supervise and support are informed regarding the risks, preventive countermeasures (e.g., water consumption), early signs and symptoms, and first-responder actions related to heat illnesses.13–19,22 Leaders should be aware of the dangers of insufficient hydration on the one hand and excessive water intake on the other; they must have detailed knowledge of, and rigidly enforce countermeasures against, all types of heat illnesses.

Policies, guidance, and other information related to heat illness prevention and treatment among U.S. military members are available online at https://phc.amedd.army.mil/topics/discond/hipss/Pages/Heat-Related-Illness-Prevention.aspx.

Acknowledgment: The authors thank the Army Public Health Center, Aberdeen, MD, for providing data on reportable medical events of heat illnesses.

REFERENCES

1. Atha WF. Heat-related illness. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2013;31(4):1097–1108.

2. Simon HB. Hyperthermia. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(7):483–487.

3. O’Connor FG, Sawka MN, Deuster P. Disorders due to heat and cold. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, eds. Goldman-Cecil Medicine. 25th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2016:692–693.

4. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch in collaboration with U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Army Public Health Center, and Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center. Armed Forces Reportable Medical Events: Guidelines and Case Definitions. https://health.mil/Reference-Center/Publications/2017/07/17/Armed-Forces-Reportable-Medical-Events-Guidelines. Published 17 July 2017. Accessed 11 March 2019.

5. Leon LR, Bouchama A. Heat stroke. Compr Physiol. 2015;5(2):611–647.

6. Epstein Y. Heat intolerance: predisposing factor or residual injury? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(1):29–35.

7. O’Connor FG, Casa DJ, Bergeron MF, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exertional heat stroke—return to duty/return to play: conference proceedings. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010;9(5):314–321.

8. Shapiro Y, Magazanik A, Udassin R, Ben-Baruch G, Shvartz E, Shoenfeld Y. Heat intolerance in former heatstroke patients. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90(6):913–916.

9. Dematte JE, O’Mara K, Buescher J, et al. Near-fatal heat stroke during the 1995 heat wave in Chicago. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(3):173–181.

10. Wallace RF, Kriebel D, Punnett L, Wegman DH, Amoroso PJ. Prior heat illness hospitalization and risk of early death. Environ Res. 2007;104(2):290–295.

11. Carter R 3rd, Cheuvront SN, Williams JO, et al. Epidemiology of hospitalizations and deaths from heat illness in soldiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(8):1338–1344.

12. Sawka MN, Cheuvront SN, Kenefick RW. High skin temperature and hypohydration impair aerobic performance. Exp Physiol. 2012;97(3):327–332.

13. Goldman RF. Introduction to heat-related problems in military operations. In Lounsbury DE, Bellamy RF, Zajtchuk R, eds. Textbook of Military Medicine: Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments, Volume 1. Washinton, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Borden Institute; 2001:3–49.

14. Sonna LA. Practical medical aspects of military operations in the heat. In Lounsbury DE, Bellamy RF, Zajtchuk R, eds. Textbook of Military Medicine: Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments, Volume 1. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Borden Institute; 2001:293–309.

15. Headquarters, Department of the Army and Air Force. Technical Bulletin, Medical, 507, Air Force Pamphlet 48-152: Heat Stress Control and Heat Casualty Management. Washington, DC: Department of the Army and Air Force; 2003. https://www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb/documents/Heat_illness_prevention_tbmed507.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019.

16. Headquarters, United States Marine Corps, Department of the Navy. Marine Corps Order 6200.1E: Marine Corps Heat Injury Prevention Program. Washington DC: Department of the Navy; 2002. http://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/MCO%206200.1E%20W%20CH%201.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019.

17. Navy Environmental Health Center. NEHCTM-OEM 6260.6A: Prevention and Treatment of Heat and Cold Stress Injuries. http://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmcphc/Documents/nepmu-6/Environmental-Health/Disease-Prevention/Technical-Manual-NEHC-TM-OEM-6260-6A.pdf. Published June 2007. Accessed 11 March 2019.

18. Webber BJ, Casa DJ, Beutler AI, Nye NS, Trueblood WE, O'Connor FG. Preventing exertional death in military trainees: recommendations and treatment algorithms from a multidisciplinary working group. Mil Med. 2016;181(4):311–318.

19. Lee JK, Kenefick RW, Cheuvront SN. Novel cooling strategies for military training and operations. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(suppl 11):S77–S81.

20. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Update: Heat injuries, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2017. MSMR. 2018;25(4):6–10.

21. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Surveillance Case Definition. Heat Illness. March 2018. https://health.mil/Reference-Center/Publications/2017/03/01/Heat-Injuries. Accessed 11 March 2019.

22. Headquarters, Department of the Army, Training and Doctrine Command. Memorandum. TRADOC Heat Illness Prevention Program 2018. 8 January 2018.

Incident casesa and incidence rates of heat stroke by source of report and year of diagnosis, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2018

Incident casesa and incidence rates of heat exhaustion, by source of report and year of diagnosis, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2018

Numbers of heat illnesses diagnosed in Iraq/Afghanistan, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2018

Incident casesa and incidence ratesb of heat illness, active component service members, U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, 2018

Heat injury eventsa by location of diagnosis/report (with at least 100 cases during the period), active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2018

You also may be interested in...

Diagnosis of hepatitis C infection and cascade of care in the active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2020

Article
2/1/2022
Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Cecil Dorse, left, and Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Janet Rosas test blood samples aboard the Military Sealift Command hospital ship USNS Comfort while the ship is in New York City in support of the nation’s COVID-19 response, April 6, 2020. Photo By: Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Sara Eshleman

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rates are rising in the U.S. despite widely available tools to identify and effectively treat nearly all of these cases. This cross-sectional study aimed to use laboratory data to evaluate the prevalence of HCV diagnoses among active component U.S. military service members.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

A new approach to categorization of ocular injury among U.S. Armed Forces

Article
2/1/2022
Air Force and Space Force Surgeon General Lt. Gen. Dorothy Hogg receives an eye exam from Air Force Reserve Maj. Leslie Wilderson at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, Washington, D.C., March 26, 2021. Photo By: Air Force Staff Sgt. Kayla White

Ocular injuries present an ongoing threat to readiness and retention of service members. This report describes a new approach to categorizing ocular injury using Military Health System data, the application of an algorithm to a dataset, and the verification of the results using an audit of clinical data.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance snapshot: Health care burden attributable to osteoarthritis and spondylosis, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016–2020

Article
2/1/2022
Air Force security forces trainees climb a hill during a 3-mile ruck march to commemorate National Police Week at Joint Base San Antonio, May 13, 2019. Photo By: Sarayuth Pinthong, Air Force

This snapshot summarizes the total numbers of inpatient and outpatient encounters with an OA or spondylosis diagnosis in the first diagnostic position and the total numbers of unique individuals affected by these conditions during the same 5-year surveillance period.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Description of a COVID-19 Beta Variant Outbreak, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, February–March 2021

Article
1/1/2022
U.S. Army Soldiers from 1-17th Infantry Battalion, 2nd Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, clear an objective during the training exercise Bayonet Focus 19-02 at Yakima Training Center, Wash., May 6, 2019. Bayonet Focus is a training exercise designed to assess Soldiers’ ability to preform tasks and complete objectives under conditions experienced during combat situations. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Angel Ruszkiewicz)

This report describes an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, that peaked during 21–26 February 2021 and was tied to a single military training event. A total of 143 laboratory-confirmed cases were identified.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

COVID-19 and Depressive Symptoms Among Active Component U.S. Service Members, January 2019–July 2021

Article
1/1/2022
With the holiday season upon us, the cold, dark days that winter brings, and the social distancing and movement restrictions brought about by COVID-19, it’s not uncommon for people to feel depressed. (Photo by Erin Bolling)

This study examined the rates of depressive symptoms in active component U.S. service members prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluated whether SARS-CoV-2 test results (positive or negative) were associated with self-reported depressive symptoms.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: Lengths of Hospital Stays for Service Members Diagnosed with Sepsis, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2011–2020

Article
1/1/2022
The (left to right) Senior Airman Austin Shrewsbury, 88th Diagnostics and Therapeutic Squadron medical laboratory technician, works with student, Airman 1st Class Taylor Altman, 88th Diagnostics and Therapeutic Squadron medical laboratory technician, to identify bacteria of patient’s cultures inside the microbiology laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base medical center June 30, 2017.

Sepsis is a serious and life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. In the U.S., sepsis is a leading cause of in-hospital mortality and 1 of the most expensive conditions treated in U.S. hospitals.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Incident COVID-19 Infections, Active and Reserve Components, Jan. 1, 2020–Aug. 31, 2021

Article
12/1/2021
U.S. Marines with Marine Rotational Force - Darwin receive a second COVID-19 test during quarantine on Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin in Darwin, NT, Australia, June 12, 2020. The COVID-19 test was administered to each Marine after arriving from California. All Marines will be quarantined for 14 days and undergo an additional test before quarantine release. No Marines tested positive for COVID-19. The U.S. Marine Corps and Australian Defence Force service members are working together to ensure the safety of the local community. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Natalie Greenwood)

Incident COVID-19 Infections, Active and Reserve Components, 1 January 2020–31 August 2021

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: Donovanosis Among Active Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2011–2020

Article
12/1/2021
This photomicrograph of a tissue sample extracted from a lesion in the inguinal region of the female granuloma inguinale, or Donovanosis patient, depicted in PHIL 6431, revealed a white blood cell (WBC) that contained the pathognomonic finding of Donovan bodies, which were encapsulated, Gram-negative rods, representing the responsible bacterium Klebsiella granulomatis, formerly known as Calymmatobacterium granulomatis. Photo credit: CDC/ Susan Lindsley

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Osteoarthritis and Spondylosis, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2016–2020

Article
12/1/2021
Osteoarthritis (OA) knee . film x-ray AP ( anterior - posterior ) and lateral view of knee show narrow joint space, osteophyte ( spur ), subchondral sclerosis, knee joint inflammation. Photo by: iStockPhoto

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most com­mon adult joint disease, is primarily a degenerative disorder of the entire joint organ, including the subchondral bone, synovium, and periarticular structures (e.g., tendons, ligaments, bursae). Spondylosis, often referred to as OA of the spine, is characterized by degenerative changes in the vertebral discs, joints, and vertebral bodies.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Sepsis Hospitalizations Among Active Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2011–2020

Article
11/1/2021
SAN DIEGO (Oct. 19, 2020) Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Brittni Porter, a laboratory technician assigned to Naval Medical Center San Diego’s (NMCSD) microbiology laboratory, exams agar slides during a drug susceptibility tests Oct. 19. Drug susceptibility tests are conducted to see if a particular antibiotic will react with a patient’s sample on an agar slide. NMCSD’s mission is to prepare service members to deploy in support of operational forces, deliver high quality healthcare services and shape the future of military medicine through education, training and research. NMCSD employs more than 6,000 active duty military personnel, civilians, and contractors in Southern California to provide patients with world-class care anytime, anywhere. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jake Greenberg)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Plant Dermatitis Among Active Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2010–2020

Article
11/1/2021
Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)

Plant dermatitis is an allergic inflammatory skin reaction in response to the oils of poisonous plants. In the U.S., the most common dermatitis-causing plant genus is the Toxicodendron (formerly Rhus). Approximately 50%–75% of the U.S. adult population are susceptible to skin reactions upon exposure to Toxicodendron oil or oleoresin, called urushiol.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Brief Report: Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infections in U.S. Air Force Basic Military Trainees Who Donated Blood, 2017–2020

Article
11/1/2021
U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Brandon Sousa, 424th Engineer Vertical Construction Company, donates blood to the 379th Expeditionary Medical Group’s Blood Support Center, Aug. 30, 2021, at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar. The blood support center conducted a walking blood bank to collect blood from prescreened and cleared donors. The blood was sent downrange to support Afghanistan evacuation operations. The DoD is committed to supporting the U.S. State Department in the departure of U.S. and allied civilian personnel from Afghanistan, and to evacuate Afghan allies to safety. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Kylie Barrow)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Brief Report: The Challenge of Interpreting Repeated Positive Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Among Military Service Members, Fort Jackson, SC, 2020–2021

Article
10/1/2021
Gloved hand holding an example of a negative rapid test for the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19).

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: History of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Air Force Recruits Arriving at Basic Training, March 2–June 15, 2021

Article
10/1/2021
COVID-19 vaccine bottle and syringes

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Cold Weather Injuries, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2016–June 2020

Article
10/1/2021
A student in the army participates in a cold-water immersion training

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 Page 1 of 15

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.