Back to Top Skip to main content

The art of moulage

Combat Medic Training program students at the Medical Education and Training Campus at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston conduct an emergency cricothyrotomy on a “casualty” during simulation training. The “wounded” manikin also presents with facial burns that were created with moulage techniques. (DoD photo by Lisa Braun) Combat Medic Training program students at the Medical Education and Training Campus at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston conduct an emergency cricothyrotomy on a “casualty” during simulation training. The “wounded” manikin also presents with facial burns that were created with moulage techniques. (DoD photo by Lisa Braun)

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-FORT SAM HOUSTON, Texas — The saying “train like we fight” is a common idiom in the military training spectrum. As combatants, service members must train for a variety of scenarios that will prepare them to succeed when engaged in real-life conflicts.

Simulation plays an important role in preparing enlisted medical trainees at the Medical Education and Training Campus, or METC, at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston to respond appropriately when faced with an actual life-or-death situation.

For the combat medic trainees in the Department of Combat Medic Training, or DCMT, program who, due to the sheer size and number of classes, will not have an opportunity to see real patients until after they graduate from the program, the realism goes a step further.

The use of high-fidelity human patient simulators that mimic actual patient encounters will prepare Soldier medics with the basic skills that will save lives – on and off the battlefield.

When the training scenario calls for treating casualties with combat wounds or injuries, however, less expensive generic manikins are incorporated and given a makeover to look the part because not many manikins have wounds already on them.

“To better simulate battlefield wounds or injuries our simulation instructors have become moulage artists to make realistic wounds and injuries that give these manikins more realism,” said Donald Parsons, DCMT program director. “This allows the students to actually see and treat wounds they will see on the battlefield, but they can also make their mistakes on the manikin without risking someone’s life.”

These realistic injuries may include an amputation, head and chest gunshot wounds, and other traumas associated with combat injuries. As the combat medic trainees, or Soldier medics as they are called in the training environment, respond to the simulated casualty they are simultaneously reinforcing the skills they learned in the classroom – from a basic injury assessment to more complex wound care.

Camille Espinoza, a civilian DCMT training instructor and simulations technician, heads the process of transforming a generic, low-fidelity manikin into a combat casualty. As an art, moulage is a process of trial and error so Espinoza is always learning new techniques. Her team offers ideas and assists with some of the moulage application.

Espinoza has had to create a way for students to apply needle chest decompressions, or NCD, on the manikins, for example. An NCD is a medical procedure that is most commonly used to treat patients suffering from a punctured or collapsed lung by inserting a needle with a catheter on the end through the chest cavity.

In the past, students would utilize a task trainer for working on specific procedures, such as a NCD, tourniquet, or wound packing among others. The students would assess the manikin first then turn to a task trainer to treat the wounds.

Espinoza modified the chests on the low-fidelity manikins, which are made out of PVC, so that the NCD insertion spots are soft enough to allow students to puncture through the manikin without causing the catheter to bend.  She also gave them trachea inserts that she carved into the manikins, and added injuries that look more realistic.

Now, students can examine and assess the “casualty,” inspect the location of the wounds and perform all of their interventions directly on the manikin itself. A set of manikins was created to use just for testing as well.

One of the biggest challenges with creating the wounds is that the manikins take a lot of abuse when students practice with them because they get moved around a lot to different outdoor locations where dirt and other elements wear down the moulage effect.

Many of the materials would break down or wear off too quickly, so experimenting with different moulage techniques and materials that make the wounds last longer is part of the process. Feedback from instructors was also an important factor in determining what works and what doesn’t.

“A lot of the stuff that special effects people do is usually a one or two time use, so it doesn’t need to last a long time,” Espinoza explained. “Unfortunately, I have students from three Whiskey teams that come down to the simulation lab so we’re running around 1,000 Soldiers through there. I had to figure out what the best materials were, the least expensive, the most effective; there was a whole lot of stuff that was going on trying to come up with the best way to apply the moulage and then hope it doesn’t break up too quickly. It’s all trial and error.”

Through the process of trial and error, Espinoza discovered that silicone-based material helps the moulage stay on longer. If it gets worn out it can easily be cleaned up and redone. The manikins can potentially be used hundreds of times before the moulage wears down, depending on the type of injury.

Some wounds, like amputations, don’t last as long because the manikins are being dragged continuously through the dirt during training. Facial wounds, though, tend to last longer because the face does not make contact with hard surfaces.

Modifying a manikin may take two or three days, depending on the wound being depicted. Some injuries needs to be created in steps and can be time consuming, so an assembly line process is ideal.

Espinoza and her team can line up three to five manikins, start working on one then move on to the next one while the previous one is drying, solidifying or cooling from having to heat the plastic to soften it for an effect.

The most important factor is making sure that the manikin is dry before moving on to the next step. Rushing through a modification may result in the moulage not staying on.

Depicting a shrapnel wound, for example, means that Espinoza will need to cut into the manikin. In order to do this, the area on the manikin where the wound will be created is heated in order to soften it so it can be cut and manipulated to form a wound. Then it will be painted to look realistic and set to dry.

If it’s possible to make use of materials already on hand, Espinoza will find a way to incorporate them into her design as well.

“We don’t want to use more than what we need or waste more than what we have,” she said.

Espinoza has used the popcorn material used for packing boxes to stuff the lower portion of manikin legs where a wound is depicted before adding foam to the area so students could learn how to pack the wound and practice applying tourniquets.  Prior to that, the foam would crack and fall apart.

“We just had to modify a lot of the stuff that we did in order to find the best way to do it.” 

Espinoza takes great pains to ensure she creates as realistic a product as possible.

“I want the students to get that shock and awe when they see the injuries without having that reaction the first time seeing it on a person, on a Soldier, on their battle buddy,” she added. “I would rather they have something as realistic as possible in these manikins without having somebody actually injured." 

A fellow instructor of Espinoza’s, who is now retired, once told her that what they’re doing now is saving lives through other people's hands. Those words have always stuck with her.

“I can do my job through these medics. If I can make something as real as possible so they can get that, ‘oh my god, this is for real!’ reaction and it makes sense, that’s all I really care about. I can get in their head and make them understand that what they’re doing makes a difference.”

To Espinoza, making mistakes on the manikins is the point of the training.

“You have to make mistakes to learn. If the students do it wrong here they can learn from it. I want them to do it wrong, because if they always do it right then what are they going to learn?"

“That’s exactly what I’ve done with these manikins,” she added. “I’ve had to make mistakes to learn how to make them better for the students to make their mistakes so they can get better. I’d much rather they do that here then on the battlefield.”

Disclaimer: Re-published content may be edited for length and clarity. Read original post.

You also may be interested in...

Five cold seasons: July 2012-June 2017, Active reserve component service members who were diagnosed with a cold weather injury

Infographic
1/18/2018
Did you know during the 5-year surveillance period, the 2,717 service members who were affected by any cold weather injury included 2,307 from the active component and 410 from the reserve component. Overall, Army members comprised the majority (61.6%) of all cold injuries affecting active and reserve component service members. Of all affected reserve component members, 71.7% (n=294) were members of the Army. Cold weather injuries During Basic Training Of all active component service members who were diagnosed with a cold weather injury (n= 2,307), 230 (10.0% of the total) were affected during basic training. Additionally, during the surveillance period, 60 service members who were diagnosed with cold weather injuries during basic training (2.6% of the total) were hospitalized, and most (93.3%) of the hospitalized cases were members of either the Army (n=32) or Marine Corps (n=24). Cold weather injuries during basic training pie chart: The Army (n=122) and Marine Corps (n=99) comprised 96.1% of all basic trainees who were diagnosed with a cold weather injury. Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR  #ColdReadiness Image of service member tracking in the snow is the infographic background graphic.

This infographic provides information on active and reserve component service members who were affected by any cold weather injury during the July 2012 – June 2017 cold seasons.

Recommended Content:

Winter Safety | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Health Readiness

Update: Cold Weather Injuries, Active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2012 – June 2017

Infographic
1/18/2018
The total number of cold weather injuries among active component service members in 2016 – 2017 cold season was the lowest since 1999. 2016 – 2017 versus the previous four cold seasons  •	A total of 387 members of the active (n=328) and reserve (n=59) components had at least one medical encounter with a primary diagnosis of cold weather injury. •	Rates tended to be higher among service members who were in the youngest age groups, female, non-Hispanic black, or in the Army. •	Cold weather injuries associated with overseas deployments have fallen precipitously in the past three cold seasons due to changes in military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. There were just 10 cases in the 2016 – 2017 season.  •	Frostbite was the most common type of cold weather injury. Bar chart displays numbers of service members who had a cold injury (one per person per year), by service and cold season, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2012 – June 2017. Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR  #ColdReadiness

This infographic provides an update for cold weather injuries among active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2012 – June 2017.

Recommended Content:

Winter Safety | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Health Readiness

Incidence rates of cold weather injuries: Non-Hispanic black service members, five cold weather seasons, July 2012 – June 2017

Infographic
1/18/2018
Did you know for all of the services, overall rates of cold weather injuries were higher among non-Hispanic black service members than among those of other race/ethnicity groups? •	Rates of cold weather injuries among non-Hispanic black service members were two-times as high as those among non-Hispanic white or other race/ethnicity groups.  •	The rates of frostbite among non-Hispanic black service members were three-times those of the other race/ethnicity groups. Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to www.Health.mil/MSMR  #ColdReadiness Image of non-Hispanic black service member in the snow displays.

This infographic documents incidence rates of cold weather injuries among non-Hispanic black service members during the July 2012 – June 2017 cold weather seasons.

Recommended Content:

Winter Safety | Health Readiness

2016 – 2017 Cold Season, Cold Weather Injuries, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces

Infographic
1/18/2018
or the 2016 – 2017 cold season, the number of active component service members with cold weather injuries was the lowest of the last 18 cold seasons since the Medical Surveillance Monthly Report (MSMR) began reporting such data in the 1999-2000 cold season. Findings •	The overall incidence rate for cold weather injuries for all active component service members in 2016 – 2017 was 15% lower than the rate for the 2015 – 2016 cold season. •	The 2016 – 2017 rate was the lowest of the entire five year surveillance period. •	In the 2016 – 2017 cold season, the Army’s incidence rate of 41.0 per 100,000 person-years for active component soldiers was 18% lower than the Army’s lowest previous rate in 2012 – 2013. •	In the Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the active component rate for 2016 – 2017 was only slightly higher than their lowest rates during the 2012—2017 surveillance period. Pie chart 1 (left side of infographic): Cold Weather Injuries, By Service, Active Component, 2016 – 2017 data •	Army 57.6% (n=189) •	Marine Corps 21.0% (n=69) •	Air Force - 13.1% (n=43) •	Navy – 8.2% (n=27) •	The sharp decline in the Army rate during the 2016 – 2017 cold season drove the overall decline for all services combined. Pie chart 2 (right side of infographic): Percentage distribution by service of cold weather injuries among reserve component service members during cold season 2016 – 2017  •	Army 72.9% (n=43) •	Marine Corps 13.5% (n=8) •	Air Force 13.5% (n=8) •	Navy (n= 0) •	For the 2016 – 2017 cold season, the overall rate of cold weather injuries for the reserve component and the rates for each of the services except the Air Force were lower than in any of the previous four seasons. Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR

This infographic documents cold weather injuries among the active and reserve components of the U.S. Armed Forces for the 2016 – 2017 cold season.

Recommended Content:

Winter Safety | Health Readiness

Cold weather injuries by military location, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2012 – June 2017

Infographic
1/18/2018
From July 2016 through June 2017, a total of 24 military locations had at least 30 incident cold weather injuries (one per person, per year) among active and reserve component service members.  The locations with the highest 5-year counts of incident injuries were: •	Fort Wainwright, AK (175) •	Bavaria (Grafenwoehr/Vilseck), Germany (110) •	Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island/ Beaufort, SC (102) •	Fort Benning, GA (99) •	Fort Carson, CO (88) •	Marine Corps Base Quantico, VA (86) •	Fort Bragg, NC (78) Map displays the information above. 2016 – 2017 cold season During the 2016 – 2017 cold season, the numbers of incident cases of cold weather injuries were higher than the counts for the previous 2015-2016 cold season at seven of the 24 locations. The most noteworthy increase was found at the Army’s Fort Wainwright, where there were 48 total cases diagnosed in 2016 – 2017 , compared to just 16 during the 2015 – 2016 cold season. Bar chart shows annual number of cold weather injuries (cold season 2016 – 2017) and median number of cold weather injuries (cold seasons 2012 – 2016) at military locations with at least 30 cold weather injuries during the surveillance period, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, July 2012 – June 2017. Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR Image in background includes  service members out in the snow.

This infographic documents cold weather injuries by military location among U.S. Armed Forces for the July 2012 – June 2017 cold seasons.

Recommended Content:

Winter Safety | Health Readiness

Percentages of each Service’s cold weather injuries, 2016 – 2017 cold season

Infographic
1/18/2018
Did you know when all cold weather injuries were considered, not just the numbers of individuals affected, frostbite was the most common type of cold weather injury, comprising 53% (n=177) of all cold weather injuries among active component service members in 2016 – 2017? •	In the Air Force and Army respectively, 60.9% and 58.9% of all cold weather injuries were frostbite, whereas the proportions in the Marine Corps (42.9%) and Navy (25.0%) were much lower. •	For the Navy, the 2016-2017 number and rate of frostbite injuries in active component service members were the lowest of the past 5 years. •	The number of immersion injury cases in 2016 – 2017 in the Marine Corps was the lowest of the 5-year surveillance period. Bar graph: Percentages of each Service’s cold weather injuries that were frostbite, 2016 – 2017 cold season •	Air Force (60.9%) •	Army (58.9%) •	Marine Corps (42.9%) •	Navy (25.0%) For all active component service members during the 2016 – 2017, the proportions of non-frostbite cold weather injuries were as follows: •	19.5% hypothermia •	17.7% immersion injuries •	9.9% Other & unspecified cold weather injuries Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR  #ColdReadiness

This infographic documents the percentages of each service’s cold weather injuries, U.S. Armed Forces for the 2016 – 2017 cold season.

Recommended Content:

Winter Safety | Health Readiness

Cold weather injuries during deployments, July 2012 – June 2017

Infographic
1/18/2018
During the 5-year surveillance period, 105 cold weather injuries were diagnosed and treated in service members deployed outside the U.S. of these, 39 (37%) were immersion injuries; 33 (31%) were frostbite; 16 (15%) were hypothermia; and 17 (16%) were “unspecified” cold weather injuries. Pie chart for cold weather injuries during deployments displays depicting the information above. Number of cold weather injuries bar chart: Of all 105 cold weather injuries during the surveillance period, 68% occurred during the first two cold seasons. Bar chart shows the number of cold weather injuries by year: •	2012-2013 cold season had 35 cold weather injuries •	2013-2014 cold season had 100 cold weather injuries •	2014 -2015 cold season had 13 cold weather injuries •	2015-2016 cold season had 11 cold weather injuries •	2016 – 2017 had 10 cold weather injuries Access the full report in the October 2017 MSMR (Vol. 24, No. 10). Go to: www.Health.mil/MSMR  #ColdReadiness

This infographic documents cold weather injuries during deployments for the July 2012 – June 2017 cold seasons.

Recommended Content:

Women's Health | Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch | Health Readiness

Global Health Engagement Month #3

Infographic
12/29/2015
infographic for global health engagement

A healthy partner is a stable partner! Supporting partner nations' health system capacities is a critical element of global health engagement.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness | Global Health Engagement
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 
Showing results 61 - 68 Page 5 of 5

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.