Skip to main content

Military Health System

SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Coinfection in a Deployed Military Setting—Two Case Reports

Image of Illustration reveals ultrastructural morphology exhibited by coronaviruses. This illustration, created at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), reveals ultrastructural morphology exhibited by coronaviruses. Note the spikes that adorn the outer surface of the virus, which impart the look of a corona surrounding the virion, when viewed electron microscopically. A novel coronavirus, named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified as the cause of an outbreak of respiratory illness first detected in Wuhan, China in 2019. The illness caused by this virus has been named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). (Credit: Alissa Eckert, MSMI; Dan Higgins, MAMS)

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is responsible for a global pandemic with over 46 million cases worldwide, including over 9 million in the U.S. and 83,000 in the DoD as of 2 November 2020.1,2 COVID-19 presents as a broad spectrum of disease progression and manifestations ranging from asymptomatic carriage/colonization to acute respiratory distress syndrome leading to severe complications or death. Risk factors for severe disease include several comorbidities: older age (≥65 years), hypertension (HTN), cardiovascular disease, smoking, chronic respiratory disease, cancer, diabetes (DM), obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), and male sex.3–6 Additionally, some workplace exposures pose significant risks of infection among workers based on close contacts with high risk populations (e.g., COVID-19 patients, factory workers).Deployment may place service members at higher risk for respiratory infections; for example, a high-profile COVID-19 outbreak on the USS Theodore Roosevelt during deployment was recently described.8

In contrast to COVID-19, the military faces seasonal influenza every year. Risk factors of seasonal influenza overlap with those associated with COVID-19 (e.g., immune suppressed, older age, comorbidities), as do clinical presentations (fever, cough, headaches, and malaise).9 Fortunately, influenza-associated deaths among the U.S. military have been relatively few. This is most likely because of the good preexisting health status of the US military, prompt detection of influenza with rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), several effective antiviral therapeutics for early treatment and chemoprophylaxis, and a robust, compulsory vaccination program. The seasonal influenza vaccine has been shown to reduce the risk for influenza illness and associated morbidity and mortality worldwide.10

Coinfection with both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza was reported early in the pandemic, when 46 (49%) of a case series of 93 critically ill COVID-19 cases from Wuhan, China were found to be coinfected with influenza virus.11 Several case reports and case series documenting similar coinfections have been published since then.12–15 Although one meta-analysis estimated that only 3% of COVID-19 cases are coinfected with another virus,16 the impact of coinfections is uncertain due to substantial heterogeneity between populations and environments. This report describes a case series of the first 2 coinfections of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza in the deployed setting, specifically at a U.S. Army Role I Military Treatment Facility (MTF) within the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR). The threats, challenges, and mitigation strategies for these coinfections in the deployed setting are also described.

Case 1

On 8 October 2020, a 56 year old white male contractor, presented to a Role I clinic with symptoms of anorexia, fever, chills, and headache which began 3 days prior. His initial vital signs were unremarkable (blood pressure [BP]: 112/72; pulse [P]: 96; respiratory rate [RR]: 18; peripheral capillary oxygen saturation [SpO2]: 97% RA; temperature [T]: 97o F). He did not display respiratory distress. The QuickVue® rapid point-of-care antigen test was positive for influenza type A; a COVID-19 test was performed but results were not immediately available. He had not received the 2020–2021 seasonal influenza vaccine. He was immediately placed on isolation and antiviral treatment with osteltamivir was initiated. His past medical history was significant for hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea (no continuous positive airway pressure was required). His routine medications included amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan. He did not report any allergies to medications. His physical exam was unremarkable. Subsequently, he tested positive for COVID-19 by nasopharyngeal swab from the Biofire® (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]). On day 6 of the illness, he developed a non-productive cough and myalgias. He completed his course of osteltamivir without issues. On day 9 of illness, the patient complained of “body stiffness” and was prescribed ibuprofen as needed. The remaining course of infection was unremarkable and afebrile. There were no anti-pyretics prescribed for the 24 hours prior to release from isolation and the symptoms were improving. No further testing or diagnostics were required. His condition did not warrant hospitalization. Three close contacts were identified. One contact had symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and was tested; this test came back positive, so the contact was also considered a confirmed case and was isolated for 10 days. At this point, further contact tracing was performed. The 2 other contacts remained asymptomatic during their 14-day quarantine. Ten days after symptom onset, Case 1 returned to duty as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations.17

Case 2

On 9 October 2020, a 34 year old white male Army officer was initially identified as a close contact of a confirmed COVID-19 case and placed in quarantine. He was asymptomatic but tested positive for COVID-19 by the Biofire® RT-PCR. He was placed in isolation with precautions. He did not report any significant past medical history, comorbidities, or medications. His initial vital signs revealed an elevated blood pressure but were otherwise unremarkable (BP: 143/76; P: 83; RR: 16; SpO2: 97%; T:97o F). He continued to be asymptomatic until 2 days later when he complained of myalgias. He did not display any respiratory distress or other symptoms. Since myalgias are a classic symptom of seasonal influenza, the provider ordered a QuickVue® rapid influenza antigen test, which was positive for influenza type B, so the provider started him on the antiviral osteltamivir. He had not received the 2020–2021 seasonal influenza vaccine. His vital signs were stable throughout the illness and the initial elevated blood pressure normalized. His physical exam was unremarkable. On the next day (day 4 from the inititation of quarantine), he complained of new onset nausea and vomiting after taking the osteltamivir. As nausea and vomiting are common side effects of osteltamivir, the provider adjusted the timing of the medicine and prescribed ondansetron as needed for nausea. On day 7, his blood pressure increased to 144/62 and the patient complained of ageusia and anosmia (loss of taste and smell, respectively). On day 8, symptoms also included slight fatigue, but he had no respiratory distress and his vital signs were normal. He completed the course of Tamiflu®. On day 9, he complained of a cough and shortness of breath plus diarrhea, but his vital signs remained normal (BP: 112/80; P: 68; RR: 18; SpO2 98%; T: 96o F) and his physical exam was unremarkable. His symptoms improved through supportive care.

Throughout the remaining course of illness, the patient remained afebrile and improved with no anti-pyretics 24 hours prior to release from isolation. There were no indications for further testing or diagnostics. His course of illness did not warrant hospital admission. Six close contacts were identified; all 6 remained asymptomatic during the 14-day quarantine. Ten days after symptom onset, Case 2 was returned to duty.

Editorial Comment

This report describes the first 2 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and influenza coinfection among U.S. personnel deployed within the CENTCOM AOR. Because seasonal influenza and COVID-19 both present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations and overlapping symptoms, providers should consider the possibility of infection with influenza, COVID-19, or coinfection among patients with respiratory illnesses. While both influenza and COVID-19 may result in severe complications and death, patients with influenza and COVID-19 coinfection have been found to have more than 2 times the odds of death compared to those affected by COVID-19 alone.18 Although standards of fitness required for deployment typically result in a generally healthy deployed population,19 there are some civilian and contractor personnel who may deploy with chronic medical conditions. Additionally, there may be environmental and occupational factors which place personnel at increased risk of infection and transmission during deployment. Some examples of this elevated risk are seen in the current case reports, including the civilian contractor who was at higher risk for occupational exposure as a linguist based on daily interaction with host nation partners, in addition to the congregate living and work settings which exist during deployments.

A Role I medical facility has limited laboratory capability in the deployed environment. The current case reports demonstrate the importance of maintaining an index of suspicion and of early testing for the multiple possible etiologic agents in order to both provide the most appropriate care and to implement effective measures to interrupt disease transmission. Rapid, point-of-care diagnostic test capabilities which include both influenza and COVID-19 can help guide antiviral treatment, implementation of effective prevention and control measures, and other clinical decisions such as antibiotic use and additional diagnostic testing. These tests should preferably be collected within 4 days of symptom onset using nasopharyngeal specimens. Rapid influenza molecular assays are recommended over antigen detection tests,20 and several multiplex nucleic acid detection assays have received Emergency Use Authorization to detect both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza types A and B viruses.21 However, false negative COVID-19 tests may also occur, particularly among those who are coinfected with influenza.13 The local epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses should influence clinical and public health decisions. When both viruses are circulating widely, providers may consider presumptive treatment, even in the context of a negative influenza test, based on mission requirements and the clinical situation. Public health may recommend quarantine for close contacts of confirmed influenza cases even if SARSCoV-2 tests are pending or negative. To enhance active case finding efforts, all close contacts of confirmed or probable cases of COVID-19 should be tested.22

The best way to prevent influenza is through annual vaccination. The fact that neither of the 2 cases had received the 2020–2021 vaccine underscores the importance of this intervention. In outpatients with uncomplicated influenza, antiviral treatment has been shown to significantly reduce illness duration, lower respiratory tract complications requiring antibiotics, and hospitalizations for any cause.23,24 Health care personnel should ensure that antiviral treatment is available and prioritized for those who are at high risk for influenza complications. Antiviral chemoprophylaxis of influenza is generally not recommended for widespread or routine use except for control of institutional influenza outbreaks, in hospitalized patients, or among outpatients with complications or progressive disease.20 Clinicians should also ensure that other treatment issues are considered for coinfected patients, such as the higher mortality seen among patients with influenza pneumonia after corticosteroid treatment.25

While this report includes only 2 cases, and further research on influenza and COVID-19 co-infection is certainly warranted, it nevertheless supports the importance of implementing force health protection (FHP) measures to prevent, detect, and respond to the spread of both of these health threats. This is particularly important in the current context of a drawdown in forces in many deployed locations, as further losses of personnel to illness may degrade Commanders’ execution of critical missions. This requires command emphasis and support of FHP measures including: vaccination, physical distancing, use of face coverings, hygiene and sanitation, contact tracing, isolation and quarantine, medical therapeutics, rapid diagnostic testing, and host nation partnerships. These case reports also highlight the importance of identifying symptomatic persons quickly enough to test, trace, and treat for both COVID-19 and influenza. Understanding the risks and epidemiologic trends of infectious diseases will enhance Commanders’ ability to mitigate the risk of these diseases in deployed forces.

Author affiliations: COL Paul O. Kwon, U.S. AMEDDAC, Fort Jackson, SC; MAJ Nathan A. Fisher, U.S. CENTCOM, Camp Arifjan, Kuwait; COL James D. Mancuso, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University, the U.S. Army, or the U.S. Department of Defense.

References

1. Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. Coronavirus resource center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/. Updated 2 November 2020. Accessed 2 November 2020.

2. US Department of Defense. Coronavirus: DOD Response (DOD COVID-19 Cumulative Totals). https://www.defense.gov/explore/spotlight/coronavirus/. Updated 30 October 2020. Accessed 2 November 2020.

3. Webb Hooper M, Napoles AM, Perez-Stable EJ. COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities. JAMA. 2020;323(24):2466-2467.

4. Ioannou GN, Locke E, Green P, et al. Risk factors for hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, or death among 10131 US veterans with SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2022310.

5. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020. 

6. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. NEngl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720.

7. Baker MG, Peckham TK, Seixas NS. Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0232452.

8. Kasper MR, Geibe JR, Sears CL, et al. An outbreak of COVID-19 on an aircraft carrier. N Engl J Med. 2020.

9. Sanchez JL, Cooper MJ. Influenza in the US military: An overview. J Infectious Diseases & Treatment. 2016;2(1):1–5.

10. Epperson S, Davis CT, Brammer L, et al. Update: Influenza activity—United States and worldwide, May 19–September 28, 2019, and composition of the 2020 southern hemisphere influenza vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(40):880–884.

11. Ma S, Lai X, Chen Z, Tu S, Qin K. Clinical characteristics of critically ill patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza virus in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:683–687.

12. Singh B, Kaur P, Reid RJ, Shamoon F, Bikkina M. COVID-19 and Influenza Co-Infection: Report of Three Cases. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9852.

13. Wu X, Cai Y, Huang X, et al. Co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A Virus in Patient with Pneumonia, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(6):1324–1326.

14. Ding Q, Lu P, Fan Y, Xia Y, Liu M. The clinical characteristics of pneumonia patients coinfected with 2019 novel coronavirus and influenza virus in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol. 2020.

15. Azekawa S, Namkoong H, Mitamura K, Kawaoka Y, Saito F. Co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus. IDCases. 2020;20:e00775.

16. Lansbury L, Lim B, Baskaran V, Lim WS. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect.2020;81(2):266–275.

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Duration of Isolation and Precautions for Adults with COVID-19. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html.Updated 19 October 2020. Accessed 18 December 2020.

18. Stowe J, Tessier E, Zhao H, et al. Interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza and the impact of coinfection on disease severity: A test negative design. medRxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.18.20189647v2. Updated 22September 2020. Accessed 3 November 2020.

19. U.S. Central Command. MOD FIFTEEN TO USCENTCOM INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION AND INDIVIDUAL-UNIT DEPLOYMENT POLICY. https://media.defense.gov/2020/Aug/29/2002487210/-1/-1/0/USCENTCOM%20MOD%2015.PDF. Updated 9 April 2020. Accessed 3 November 2020.

20. Uyeki T, Bernstein H, Bradley J, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenza. Clin Inf Dis. 2019;68(6):e1-e47.

21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD). Table 4. Multiplex Assays Authorized for Simultaneous Detection of Influenza Viruses and SARS-CoV-2 by FDA. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/table-flu-covid19-detection.html. Updated 20 October 2020. Accessed 3 November 2020.

22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Contact Tracing for COVID-19. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contacttracing/contact-tracing-plan/contact-tracing.html. Updated 16 December 2020. Accessed 19 December 2020.

23. Dobson J, Whitley RJ, Pocock S, Monto AS. Oseltamivir treatment for influenza in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9979):1729–1737.

24. Malosh RE, Martin ET, Ortiz JR, Monto AS. The risk of lower respiratory tract infection following influenza virus infection: A systematic and narrative review. Vaccine. 2018;36(1):141–147.

25. Ni YN, Chen G, Sun J, Liang BM, Liang ZA. The effect of corticosteroids on mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):99.

You also may be interested in...

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 07 - July 2022

Report
7/1/2022

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the MHS during March 1 – Dec. 31 2020; Suicide behavior among heterosexual, lesbian/gay, and bisexual active component service members in the U.S. Armed Forces; Brief report: Phase I results using the Virtual Pooled Registry Cancer Linkage system (VPR-CLS) for military cancer surveillance.

Recommended Content:

Health Readiness & Combat Support | Public Health | Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

As in previous years, among service members deployed during 2021, injury/poisoning, musculoskeletal diseases and signs/symptoms accounted for more than half of the total health care burden during deployment. Compared to garrison disease burden, deployed service members had relatively higher proportions of encounters for respiratory infections, skin diseases, and infectious and parasitic diseases. The recent marked increase in the percentage of total medical encounters attributable to the ICD diagnostic category "other" (23.0% in 2017 to 44.4% in 2021) is likely due to increases in diagnostic testing and immunization associated with the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Non-service Member Beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Non-service Member Beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2021

In 2021, mental health disorders accounted for the largest proportions of the morbidity and health care burdens that affected the pediatric and younger adult beneficiary age groups. Among adults aged 45–64 and those aged 65 or older, musculoskeletal diseases accounted for the most morbidity and health care burdens. As in previous years, this report documents a substantial majority of non-service member beneficiaries received care for current illness and injury from the Military Health System as outsourced services at non-military medical facilities.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

The hospitalization rate in 2021 was 48.0 per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs), the second lowest rate of the most recent 10 years. For hospitalizations limited to military facilities, the rate in 2021 was the lowest for the entire period. As in prior years, the majority (71.2%) of hospitalizations were associated with diagnoses in the categories of mental health disorders, pregnancy-related conditions, injury/poisoning, and digestive system disorders.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, reserve component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, reserve component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

In 2021, as in prior years, the medical conditions associated with the most medical encounters, the largest number of affected service members, and the greatest number of hospital days were in the major categories of injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental health disorders. Despite the pandemic, COVID-19 accounted for less than 2% of total medical encounters and bed days in active component service members.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Medical Evacuations out of the U.S. Central and U.S. Africa Commands, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Medical Evacuations out of the U.S. Central and U.S. Africa Commands, Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

The proportions of evacuations out of USCENTCOM that were due to battle injuries declined substantially in 2021. For USCENTCOM, evacuations for mental health disorders were the most common, followed by non-battle injury and poisoning, and signs, symptoms, and ill-defined conditions. For USAFRICOM, evacuations for non-battle injury and poisoning were most common, followed by disorders of the digestive system and mental health disorders.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, recruit trainees, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Surveillance snapshot: Illness and injury burdens, recruit trainees, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Ambulatory Visits, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

Article
6/1/2022
Ambulatory Visits, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

In 2021, the overall numbers and rates of active component service member ambulatory care visits were the highest of any of the last 10 years. Most categories of illness and injury showed modest increases in numbers and rates. The proportions of ambulatory care visits that were accomplished via telehealth encounters fell to under 15% in 2021, compared to 19% in 2020.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Surveillance Snapshot: Tick-borne Encephalitis in Military Health System Beneficiaries, 2012–2021

Article
5/1/2022
iStock—The castor bean tick (Ixoedes ricinus). Credit: Erik Karits

Tick-borne Encephalitis in Military Health System Beneficiaries, 2012–2021. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infection of the central nervous system that is transmitted by the bite of infected ticks, mostly found in wooded habitats in parts of Europe and Asia

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

The Association Between Two Bogus Items, Demographics, and Military Characteristics in a 2019 Cross-sectional Survey of U.S. Army Soldiers

Article
5/1/2022
NIANTIC, CT, UNITED STATES 06.16.2022 U.S. Army Staff Sgt. John Young, an information technology specialist assigned to Joint Forces Headquarters, Connecticut Army National Guard, works on a computer at Camp Nett, Niantic, Connecticut, June 16, 2022. Young provided threat intelligence to cyber analysts that were part of his "Blue Team" during Cyber Yankee, a cyber training exercise meant to simulate a real world environment to train mission essential tasks for cyber professionals. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Matthew Lucibello)

Data from surveys may be used to make public health decisions at both the installation and the Department of the Army level. This study demonstrates that a vast majority of soldiers were likely sufficiently engaged and answered both bogus items correctly. Future surveys should continue to investigate careless responding to ensure data quality in military populations.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Update: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2013–2021

Article
5/1/2022
This illustration depicts a 3D computer-generated image of a number of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacteria. CDC/James Archer

This report summarizes incidence rates of the 5 most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among active component service members of the U.S. Armed Forces during 2013–2021. In general, compared to their respective counterparts, younger service members, non-Hispanic Black service members, those who were single and other/unknown marital status, and enlisted service members had higher incidence rates of STIs.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Evaluation of ICD-10-CM-based Case Definitions of Ambulatory Encounters for COVID-19 Among Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiaries

Article
5/1/2022
SEATTLE, WA, UNITED STATES 04.05.2020 U.S. Army Maj. Neil Alcaria is screened at the Seattle Event Center in Wash., April 5. Soldiers from Fort Carson, Colo., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. have established an Army field hospital center at the center in support of the Department of Defense COVID-19 response. U.S. Northern Command, through U.S. Army North, is providing military support to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help communities in need. (U.S. Army photo by Cpl. Rachel Thicklin)

This is the first evaluation of ICD-10-CM-based cased definitions for COVID-19 surveillance among DOD health care beneficiaries. The 3 case definitions ranged from highly specific to a lower specificity, but improved balance between sensitivity and specificity.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Exertional Hyponatremia, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2006–2021

Article
4/1/2022
Marine Corps Cpl. Luis Alicea drinks water after a combat conditioning exercise at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans, May 20, 2019. Photo By: Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Jose Gonzalez.

Exertional (or exercise-associated) hyponatremia refers to a low serum, plasma, or blood sodium concentration (below 135 mEq/L) that develops during or up to 24 hours following prolonged physical activity. Acute hyponatremia creates an osmotic imbalance between fluids outside and inside of cells.

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report

Exertional Heat Illness at Fort Benning, GA: Unique Insights from the Army Heat Center

Article
4/1/2022
Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Ryan Adams is being used as an example victim for cooling a heat casualty at the bi-annual hot weather standard operating procedure training aboard Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., Aug. 24. Adams is demonstrating the "burrito" method used to cool a heat related injury victim. Photo by Pfc. Joshua Grant.

Exertional heat illness (hereafter referred to as heat illness) spans a spectrum from relatively mild conditions such as heat cramps and heat exhaustion, to more serious and potentially life-threatening conditions such as heat injury and exertional heat stroke (hereafter heat stroke).

Recommended Content:

Medical Surveillance Monthly Report
<< < 1 2 3 4 5  ... > >> 
Showing results 1 - 15 Page 1 of 12
Refine your search
Last Updated: December 16, 2021
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery