Skip main navigation

Military Health System

Clear Your Browser Cache

This website has recently undergone changes. Users finding unexpected concerns may care to clear their browser's cache to ensure a seamless experience.

MHS refractive surgery experts discuss warfighter readiness

Image of Mr. McCaffery looking at a monitor with an eye on it. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Thomas McCaffery observes the beginning stages of a refractive surgery at the Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Oct. 21. The center is the largest refractive training program in the Department of Defense and has trained and certified more than 150 refractive surgeons. (Photo by Air Force Staff Sgt. Amanda Stanford, 59th Medical Wing.)

More than 200 participants from around the military ophthalmology and optometry communities gathered virtually on Jan. 8 to share ideas for the first time since the beginning of the transition to the Defense Health Agency.

The group participated in the “Refractive Surgery – Excellence for the Warfighter” virtual meeting where they discussed the latest techniques, safety protocols, and standards for refractive surgery. The meeting provided an opportunity for colleagues to share their experiences and get advice from experts, and was held in place of the annual Military Surgery Safety and Standards Symposium.

“We’ve been meeting since 2007 to talk about our best practices, our standards, lessons learned and safety,” said Army Maj. (Dr.) Gary Legault, Army Refractive Surgery Program manager and refractive surgery consultant to the Army surgeon general. “We emphasize key safety issues with the laser platforms and with our treatments and share the latest and greatest technology and updates.”

Refractive surgery is any surgery that eliminates the need for glasses or contact lenses. Refractive surgeries include LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis), PRK (photorefractive keratectomy), ICLs (implantable contact lenses), and SMILE (small incision lenticule extraction).

Within the Military Health System, these procedures are designed to improve the functionality, lethality, and combat readiness of the warfighter through improving their visual system. Refractive surgery is offered at no cost to qualifying service members with conditions including nearsightedness, farsightedness, and astigmatism.

Legault explained that his hope was for the meeting to produce practical lessons that those in attendance could use on a regular basis.

“We hope this helps the people in attendance from around the world of military ophthalmology and refractive surgery learn something new that they can apply to improving their practice with their patients,” Legault said.

Among the positive outcomes from the MHS’s transition to the DHA is a tri-service effort to standardize refractive surgery across the DOD.

“For us, it’s a benefit as the DHA helps us improve our standardization and create a standard experience across the board as well as become more efficient,” Legault said. “I think the DHA can help us improve our outcomes by sharing best practices and working together as a group.”

Navy Lt. Cmdr. (Dr.) Tyler Miles, research director and division officer for Naval Medical Center San Diego’s Refractive Surgery Center, agreed.

“This is an opportunity for us to all come together and share what we’re doing. We have different flavors amongst the different services, and it’s nice to be able to share our gains across the board,” Miles said.

Paramount among the improvements resulting from the transition, is having a refractive surgery board at the DHA level, he explained.

“We now have a formal voice at that tri-service level, so that might bring some formal processes that empower our programs more than before,” Miles said.

As with many other areas of military medicine, COVID-related impacts to refractive surgery include a shift to a more virtual-heavy way of conducting consultations and pre-surgery briefs.

Legault said that the most important aspect what they do is improving combat readiness.

“We want to improve the warfighter in order for them to be better at their occupation, and we want commanders and leaders to know that we are here to help,” he said. “We’re here to assist.

“It can literally mean life and death where you can see your enemy through improved visual function versus your glasses fogging up or falling off,” Legault said. “These are procedures that can make a huge difference and occur within minutes.”

Miles agreed, saying, “This is one of the few instances where we’re actually enhancing the warfighter. We’re not just fixing them up and keeping them healthy, we’re making them better. We’re providing an enhancement by making them less reliant on glasses and contact lenses, which, although they’re effective in giving you clearer vision, may be a liability in certain areas where our folks are operating.”

Proof for him that their programs are headed in the right direction, he said, is in the outcomes he’s seen.

“You just have to spend a day in a clinic seeing post-operative patients,” Miles said. “They’ll tell you that it is life-changing to be able to wake up in the morning and open their eyes and see clearly, aside from the performance advantage that it’s giving our military.”

You also may be interested in...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 6 - June 2015

.PDF | 739.84 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Update: Accidental drownings, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2005-2014; Risk of mental health disorders following an initial diagnosis of postpartum depression, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 1998 ...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 2 - February 2015

.PDF | 2.04 MB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Whither the "signature wounds of the war" after the war: estimates of incidence rates and proportions of TBI and PTSD diagnoses attributable to background risk, enhanced ascertainment, and active war zone ...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 8 - August 2015

.PDF | 542.02 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Update: Routine screening for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, civilian applicants for U.S. military service and U.S. Armed Forces, active and reserve components, January 2010-June 2015; Durations of ...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 3 - March 2015

.PDF | 2.12 MB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Characterizing the relationship between tick bites and Lyme disease in active component U.S. Armed Forces in the eastern United States; Incidence and prevalence of diagnoses of eye disorders of refraction and ...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 7 - July 2015

.PDF | 1.21 MB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Epidemiology, microbiology, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of skin and soft tissue infections, Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, Texas, 2012-2014; Post-deployment screening and referral for risky ...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 5 - May 2015

.PDF | 481.95 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Incidence of joint replacement among active component service members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2004-2014; Case series: Chikungunya and dengue at a forward operating location; Tdap vaccination coverage during ...

Report
Jan 1, 2015

MSMR Vol. 22 No. 4 - April 2015

.PDF | 743.10 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Medical Surveillance Monthly Report: The first 20 years; Absolute and relative morbidity burdens attributable to various illnesses and injuries, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014; Hospitalizations among members of active ...

Report
Aug 29, 2014

MHS Review Appendix 6 Recommendations and Comments

.PDF | 684.11 KB

Appendix 6 of the Military Health System Review Final Report covering recommendations and comments. This is the eighth of nine files making up the entire report requested by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in May, 2014. The full report focuses on access to care, safety and quality for DoD beneficiaries in miltiary treatment facilities and the ...

Report
Aug 29, 2014

MHS Review Appendix 3 to 5 Access to Care, Quality of Care, and Patient Safety

.PDF | 3.49 MB

Appendices 3-5 of the Military Health System Review Final Report covering Access to Care, Quality of Care, and Patient Safety. This is the seventh of nine files making up the entire report requested by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in May, 2014. The full report focuses on access to care, safety and quality for DoD beneficiaries in miltiary ...

Report
Aug 29, 2014

MHS Review Section 5 and 6 Patient safety in the MHS and Report Conclusions

.PDF | 699.98 KB

Sections 5 and 6 of the Military Health System Review Final Report covering Patient Safety in the MHS and the Report Conclusions. This is the fifth of nine files making up the entire report requested by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in May, 2014. The full report focuses on access to care, safety and quality for DoD beneficiaries in miltiary ...

Report
Aug 29, 2014

MHS Review Appendix 1 Introduction and Appendix 2 Overview

.PDF | 480.90 KB

Appendix 1 and 2 of the Military Health System Review Final Report covering the Introduction and Overview. This is the sixth of nine files making up the entire report requested by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in May, 2014. The full report focuses on access to care, safety and quality for DoD beneficiaries in miltiary treatment facilities and the ...

Report
Aug 29, 2014

MHS Review Report Section 3 Access to Care in the MHS

.PDF | 1.28 MB

Section 3 of the Military Health System Review Final Report covering Access to Care in the MHS. This is the third of nine files making up the entire report requested by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in May, 2014. The full report focuses on access to care, safety and quality for DoD beneficiaries in miltiary treatment facilities and the purchased ...

Report
Aug 29, 2014

MHS Review Report Executive Summary

.PDF | 325.96 KB

The executive summary of the Military Health System Review Final Report. This is the first of nine files making up the entire report requested by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in May, 2014. The full report focuses on access to care, safety and quality for DoD beneficiaries in miltiary treatment facilities and the purchased care from civilian health ...

Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search
Last Updated: January 19, 2024
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on X Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery