Skip main navigation

Military Health System

Clear Your Browser Cache

This website has recently undergone changes. Users finding unexpected concerns may care to clear their browser's cache to ensure a seamless experience.

Clinically Diagnosed Sunburn Among Active Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2014–2022

Image of 3SkinExam. A significant cause of skin cancer is excessive UVR exposure, often in the form of repeated sunburn.

Sunburn affects U.S. military mission readiness, from clothing and gear discomfort, to infection and dehydration risk due to skin barrier breakdown and fluid loss.1 Depending on a service member’s military occupation, ultraviolet radiation exposure will vary, as seen with higher incidences of sunburn in recruits, aircraft and aircraft-related occupations, and infantry.1 Clinically, sunburn is classified and managed within two main categories: mild-moderate and severe.2 Electronic health record sunburn documentation is determined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis codes that classify sunburn as sunburn of first degree, second degree, third degree, or unspecified. Sunburn of first degree (superficial burn) only affects the outer layer of the skin (epidermis), manifesting in mild to moderate erythema without blistering. Sunburn of second degree (partial thickness burn) affects both the epidermis and part of the dermis, resulting in erythema with blistering, with or without edema. Sunburn of third degree (full thickness burn) affects the epidermis and dermis, and occasionally the underlying bones, muscles, and tendons.

A significant cause of skin cancer is excessive UVR exposure, often in the form of repeated sunburn.3 Among U.S. military service members, non-melanoma skin cancers are the most frequently diagnosed cancer.4,5 Additionally, a recent Department of Defense report found that U.S. military aircrew had an 87% higher rate of melanoma, and aviation support personnel (ground crew) had a 9% higher rate of melanoma, compared to the general U.S. population.6

A 2014 MSMR report documented 19,172 incident cases of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among active component service members of the U.S. military from January 2002 to December 2013.1 Incidence rates were higher among women, non-Hispanic White service members, and those in younger age groups. Additionally, incidence was also higher for those in the Marine Corps and Army, as well as enlisted members, and recruits.1 This report describes recent frequencies and rates of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among active component service members.


This retrospective cohort study covered a surveillance period from January 1, 2014 to September 30, 2022 and included all ACSM of the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps. Data were derived from the Defense Medical Surveillance System, which is maintained by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. DMSS documents ambulatory care encounters and hospitalizations in fixed military and civilian (if reimbursed through the Military Health System) treatment facilities worldwide.

Outcome of sunburn was identified through inpatient and outpatient medical encounters containing an ICD-9 code of 692.71 (sunburn of first degree), 692.76 (sunburn of second degree), 692.77 (sunburn of third degree), or an ICD-10 code of L55.0 (sunburn of first degree), L55.1 (sunburn of second degree), L55.2 (sunburn of third degree), or L55.9 (sunburn, unspecified), in the first or second diagnostic position. The transition between ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, in 2015, occurred during the study’s surveillance period.

An individual was classified as a new case of sunburn if at least 30 days passed since the documentation of a previous sunburn-associated medical encounter. Incidence of sunburn was calculated per 100,000 person-years (p-yrs). Negative binomial regression calculated incidence rate ratios for occupation categories, adjusting for sex, age, and race and ethnicity.


Table 1 provides the total incident case counts and crude incidence rates of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among ACSM during the 9-year surveillance period. Over half of the cases were first degree sunburn (n=6,244; 54.5%), and almost all cases were diagnosed in the ambulatory setting (n=12,029; 99.95%). During the 9-year surveillance period, most, 97.1% (n=11,687), reported cases had only 1 diagnosed sunburn.

Table outlines total incident case counts and crude incidence rates of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among ACSM from 2014-2022.

The incidence rate of sunburn diagnosis was higher among women compared to men. Non-Hispanic White service members had the highest rate compared to other races and ethnicities. The three youngest age groups, under 20 years, 20-24, and 25-29 years of age, had the highest incidence rates of sunburn diagnosis, with rates decreasing with increasing age until 45 years of age. The Marine Corps and Army had the highest rates among the services. Recruits had a significantly higher sunburn incidence compared to non-recruit enlisted service members and officers.

The annual total sunburn incidence rates, which varied annually, increased overall 6.4% from 2014 (100.3 per 100,000) through 2022 (106.8 per 100,000). Of the 12,035 cases of sunburn, 5,542 occurred in June (46.0%), more than in any other month (data not shown). Ten military installations/regions accounted for 36% of all sunburns during the surveillance  period. The highest overall counts were in Okinawa, Japan (n=513) and San Diego, CA (n=510), followed closely by Fort Moore (formerly Benning), GA (n=468), and Fort Leonard Wood, MO (n=454) (data not shown).

Table 2 provides the crude and adjusted rate ratios for the association between occupational category and sunburn. The pilot/air crew category had the lowest crude and adjusted incidence rate of sunburn diagnosis.

Table 2 provides the crude and adjusted rate ratios for the association between occupational category and sunburn.


Compared to the prior MSMR report, the incidence of clinically-diagnosed sunburn among ACSM decreased 15.9% from 2002-2013 to 2014-2022 (from 124.8 cases per 100,000 p-yrs to 105.0 cases per 100,000 p-yrs).1 In both studies, women demonstrated a higher rate of sunburn diagnosis. Epidemiological data of the general U.S. population suggest that women are less likely to report frequent sunburn and are more likely to implement sunburn prevention measures.7,8,9 According to National Cancer Institute statistics, however, reported sunburn for women differs from  men by age, with younger women (aged 18-24) accounting for a higher proportion of sunburns than men in the same age group.10 The majority of ACSM are under 25 years of age, which could partially explain the higher incidence of sunburn among women described in this study.

Similar to the 2014 MSMR report, non-Hispanic White service members and younger age groups had higher diagnosed sunburn rates, which is consistent with the general U.S. population.7 The current study found that pilot/air crew had the lowest rate of sunburn diagnosis, both before and after adjustment for potential confounders, which suggests that other factors such as differences in health care utilization or sunburn prevention measures may influence lower incidence of sunburn diagnoses. 

One limitation of this study is outcome misclassification bias for sunburn diagnosis based upon health care utilization. This report likely underestimates the true rate of sunburn, as only individuals with more serious burns are likely to present for medical care. Additionally, the introduction of the ICD-10 code of “unspecified” may limit ascertainment of burn severity, potentially affecting accurate surveillance. A second limitation of this study is that the data could not differentiate sunburn during work hours versus non-work hours, challenging associations of occupation with sunburn risk.

Sunburn affects military readiness by removing service members from duty while their burns heal, affecting both garrison and combat missions. As a risk factor for future skin cancer, sunburn is a longitudinal concern for both the public health sector and the military due to the health care costs and time involved in management of melanoma and NMSC.11,12 Emphasis on prevention should continue.

Sunburn is likely multifactorial, from limited access to sunscreen, to its lack of use, variable encouragement of use by peers or leadership, operational time constraints, and low prioritization or understanding of the long-term effects of sun damage.12,13 Mitigation strategies can include pre-deployment or seasonal health promotion focused on increasing use of available sun-protective measures, including sunscreen, sunglasses, headgear, shade structures, and modified outdoor training times to early morning or later day/early evening.

Survey analysis of military-specific populations could help quantify incidence of sunburn that is more specific than clinical diagnoses, and could quantify occurrence of unreported sunburn. Survey research could evaluate behavioral practices, such as use of preventive measures, location and timing (on- or off-duty) of sunburn, and inquiry about unreported burns, which may better inform sunburn-reduction strategies.

Author Affiliations

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD: LT Van Airsdale; Defense Health Agency, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division: Dr. Stahlman, Ms. Hiban, CAPT Wells.


The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy nor position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or the Department of Defense. LT Van Airsdale is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of official duties. Title 17, U.S.C., §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C., §101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military Service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties.


  1. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch. Sunburn among active component service members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2002–2013. MSMR. 2014;21(7):2-6.
  2. Young AR and Tewari A. Sunburn. UpToDate. Updated Aug. 4, 2022. Accessed Oct. 10, 2023.
  3. Guerra KC, Crane JS. Sunburn. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed Apr. 4, 2023.
  4. Lee T, Taubman SB, Williams VF. Incident diagnoses of non-melanoma skin cancer, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2005-2014. MSMR. 2016;23(12):2-6.
  5. Mabila S, Dreyer E. Surveillance snapshot: the top 10 incident cancers among active component service members, 2018-2022. MSMR. 2023;30(9):17.
  6. U.S. Department of Defense. Phase 1-a—Study on the Incidence of Cancer Diagnosis and Mortality Among Military Aviators and Aviation Support Personnel. Jan. 2023.
  7. Braun HA, Adler CH, Goodman M, Yeung H. Sunburn frequency and risk and protective factors: a cross-sectional survey. Dermatol Online J. 2021;27(4).
  8. McKenzie C, Nahm WJ, Kearney CA, Zampella JG. Sun-protective behaviors and sunburn among US adults. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023:1-10. doi:10.1007/s00403-023-02547-z
  9. Reuter NP, Bower M, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, McMasters KM, Chagpar AB. The lower incidence of melanoma in women may be related to increased preventative behaviors. Am J Surg. 2010;200(6):765-769. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.007
  10. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cancer Trends Progress Report/Sunburn. Updated Aug. 2023. Accessed Oct. 13, 2023.
  11. Kao SYZ, Ekwueme DU, Holman DM, et al. Economic burden of skin cancer treatment in the USA: an analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data, 2012–2018. Cancer Causes Control. 2023;34:205-212. doi:10.1007/s10552-022-01644-0
  12. Rosenberg A, Cho S. We can do better at protecting our service members from skin cancer. Mil Med. 2022;187:311-313. doi:10.1093/milmed/usac198
  13. Powers JG, Patel NA, Powers EM, Mayer JE, Stricklin GP, Geller AC. Skin cancer risk factors and preventative behaviors among United States military veterans deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2871-2873. doi:10.1038/jid.2015.238

You also may be interested in...

Oct 1, 2023

MSMR Vol. 30 No. 10 - October 2023

.PDF | 1.29 MB

The October 2023 Medical Surveillance Monthly Report (MSMR) provides a review of the incidence of colorectal cancer among active component service members from 2010 to 2022; followed by a study of force protection risks in AFRICOM, INDOPACOM, and SOUTHCOM due to rapid diagnostic test failures for P. falciparum malaria from 2016 to 2022; then an update ...

Sep 1, 2023

Update: Routine Screening for Antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus, U.S. Armed Forces, Active and Reserve Components, January 2018–June 2023

This report provides an update through June 2023 of routine screening results for antibodies to HIV among members of the U.S. military. From January 2018 through June 2023, approximately 7 million U.S. military service members (active component, reserve component, and national guard) were tested for HIV antibodies; 1,502 were identified as HIV ...

Sep 1, 2023

MSMR Vol. 30 No. 9 - September 2023

.PDF | 1.30 MB

The September 2023 MSMR provides the annual update of routine screening for antibodies to HIV among the active and reserve components of the U.S. Armed Forces; followed by a serological survey of Ross River virus (RRV) infection among U.S. Marine expeditionary forces who train in Australia; followed by a Surveillance Snapshot of the 10 leading ...

Aug 1, 2023

Case Report: Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Due to an Extensively Resistant Escherichia coli in a Returning Traveler

This article presents the medical case report of a 76-year-old man who returned to the U.S. following overseas travel and was admitted at Hawai'i's Tri­pler Army Medical Center with a complicated urinary tract infection due to an extensively resistant strain of E. coli.

Aug 1, 2023

Active Surveillance for Acute Respiratory Disease Detected No Outbreaks at Four U.S. Army Basic Training Installations in 2022

This article presents the 2022 results of the active surveillance program for acute respiratory disease and Group A Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus conducted by the Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen at the four Army installations responsible for basic combat training or one-station unit training. This ARD surveillance program rapidly monitors, ...

Aug 1, 2023

MSMR Vol. 30 No. 8 - August 2023

.PDF | 1.02 MB

The August 2023 MSMR provides the most recent data from the active surveillance program for acute respiratory disease and Group A Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus among U.S. Army basic trainees; then summarizes the case report of an extensively resistant E. coli in a returning traveler at Hawai'i's Tripler Army Medical Center; followed by a Surveillance ...

Jul 1, 2023

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries Among Non-Service Member Beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2022

This report represents an updated summary of care provided to non-service members in the MHS during calendar year 2022. MHS beneficiaries are diverse and heterogeneous, including active component service members, activated National Guard and Reserve service members, active component immediate family, retirees, and their family members, with differing ...

Jul 1, 2023

Medical Evacuations out of U.S. Central and U.S. Africa Command Among Active and Reserve Components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2022

This report summarizes the nature, numbers, and trends of conditions for which military members were medically evacuated from the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) or Africa Central Command (AFRICOM) operations during 2022, with historical comparisons to the previous four years.

Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search
Last Updated: December 01, 2023
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on X Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery