Back to Top Skip to main content Skip to sub-navigation

New MHS Video Connect increases convenient access to care for patients

Image of Air Force Lt. Col. John A. DaLomba. Click to open a larger version of the image. Air Force Lt. Col. John A. DaLomba discusses the new MHS Video Connect and what it means for the MHS. (Photo by: Connected Health)

Recommended Content:

Technology | Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | MHS Video Connect | Military Hospitals and Clinics

The following article is a first-person account by Air Force Lt. Col. John A. DaLomba, MHS GENESIS Patient Portal and MHS Video Connect solution owner at the Defense Health Agency Health Informatics Branch.

Patient empowerment and active engagement are paramount to improve health care.

The Military Health System's new MHS Video Connect allows patients to meet with their military health provider virtually through live video on any internet-connected device.

MHS Video Connect is an important step forward in providing virtual health capabilities that improve health outcomes and support military readiness. It's convenient, it's secure, and it's easy to use.

Most patients already have the devices to connect with their provider or care team and receive the care they need – without leaving their home or office. This makes virtual appointments easy to schedule and conduct. Additionally, MHS Video Connect helps reduce the time and costs related to medical treatment and travel while improving the efficiency and effectiveness of virtual health.

Open to all active-duty service members, their families, and retirees enrolled in a military medical treatment facility (MTF), this new web-based virtual health platform provides real-time access to care from almost anywhere and works with existing MHS medical processes and electronic health records. All continental United States-based hospitals and clinics expected to have this capability by the end of 2021.

Convenient and Secure

Making an appointment in MHS Video Connect is simple.

Patients can use the tools they currently use contact their assigned MTF's scheduling office or, depending on their facility, do it themselves online. Providers and their staffs must schedule the appointment through the Video Care Manager module of MHS Video Connect as well.

MHS Video Connect
"MHS Video Connect provides real-time access to care from almost anywhere." (Photo by Connected Health)

By clicking a link in a confirmation email that is sent the day the appointment was scheduled, patients can meet with their provider and care team in a secure private video treatment room unique to each appointment. Both patients and providers can add up to five guests to their appointments. This enables family members, loved ones, and medical specialists to be directly involved in supporting the patient and their treatment plan, all through a high-quality video connection.

In the Department of Defense, we have to balance convenience and ease of use with cybersecurity, which is essential to protecting our nation and those who serve it. MHS Video Connect is designed specifically for secure communications for military health care, as opposed to commercial teleconferencing or video teleconferencing platforms made for more general use.

The platform is a modified version of the Department of Veterans Affairs' video virtual health solution - VA Video Connect. We have incorporated additional cybersecurity features and vetting so patients and providers can feel confident that all personal health information transmitted through the system is secure.

Looking Forward

Development of MHS Video Connect began in the fall of 2020 and in March 2021 initial testing took place at nine locations in the continental U.S. and Alaska.

Recently, limited field evaluations have happened at three locations in Europe, one in Japan, and one in South Korea. All results have been promising and while there are some things we need to work on, we are looking forward to deploying MHS Video Connect overseas sooner than later.

Ultimately, the plan is to deploy MHS Video Connect in locations that may not have a provider or dedicated medical team. The goal is to provide care wherever patients are located, in both operational and garrison settings.

Our deployment team receives feedback from the sites using MHS Video Connect, and we optimize the system regularly based on it. We are constantly examining how we can improve MHS Video Connect to better meet patient and provider needs. For example, we identified that the clinical area that uses video virtual health the most is behavioral health, which frequently uses group appointments in treatment. Moving forward, we plan to continue upgrading MHS Video Connect with the capability to host larger group appointments.

Proactive partnerships with our patients and providers are essential for preparing for the next one to five years, when more health care is likely going to be delivered virtually. Many patients won't need to go to an actual building to receive every level of care unless a provider needs to physically examine them, retrieve samples for a lab, or perform some sort of imaging.

The Military Health System is planning for that future to help ensure it meets patients where they are and delivers world-class care as effectively as possible.

You also may be interested in...

Barquist-Dietrick Army Health Clinic (AHC) Vol 1

Report
2/18/2020

The table below summarizes the findings and data informing the decision on the future of the Military Medical Treatment Facility (MTF).

Recommended Content:

Military Health System Transformation | Military Hospitals and Clinics

Deployment Health Centers Review, 2016-2017

Report
8/21/2017

This report summarizes the findings and recommendations from its independent review of the Deployment Health Centers (DHCs).

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety

Strategy Drives Function and Form Pursuing a World Class System for Health

Report
9/30/2015

Final report of the Independent Review Panel on Military Medical Construction Standards

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety

Sustainment and Advancement of Amputee Care

Report
4/8/2015

This report provides Defense Health Board findings on amputee care and research in the Department of Defense.

Recommended Content:

Conditions and Treatments | Technology

Evaluation of the TRICARE Program Fiscal Year 2015 Report to Congress

Report
2/28/2015

The Evaluation of the TRICARE Program: Access, Cost, and Quality, Fiscal Year 2015 Report to Congress is provided by the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA)/Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)—Defense Health Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (DHCAPE), in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) (OASD/HA).This evaluation report presents results trended over at least the most recent three fiscal years, where programs are mature and data permit. MHS cost, quality, and access data are compared with corresponding comparable civilian benchmarks, such as comparing beneficiary-reported access and experience to results from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), comparing our quality measures to the national expectations and results of the Joint Commission, and comparing healthrisky behavior to Healthy People 2020 objectives.

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program

Form Follows Function Pursuing a World Class System for Health

Report
2/1/2015

Form Follows Function: Pursuing a World-Class System for Health

Recommended Content:

Research and Innovation | Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety

2013 MHS Innovation Report

Report
3/3/2014

2013 Military Health System Innovation Report. This report contains information about MHS innovations in clinical care, research and development, and healthcare management. It also provides an overview of the MHS Innovation Program and information on the future of MHS innovation.

Recommended Content:

| | | Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Technology

Evaluation of the TRICARE Program Fiscal Year 2014 Report to Congress

Report
2/25/2014

The Evaluation of the TRICARE Program: Access, Cost, and Quality, Fiscal Year 2014 Report to Congress is provided by the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA)/Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)—Defense Health Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (DHCAPE), in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) (OASD/HA).This evaluation report presents results trended over at least the most recent three fiscal years, where programs are mature and data permit. MHS cost, quality, and access data are compared with corresponding comparable civilian benchmarks, such as comparing beneficiary-reported access and experience to results from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), comparing our quality measures to the national expectations and results of the Joint Commission, and comparing healthrisky behavior to Healthy People 2020 objectives.

Recommended Content:

Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program | Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | About TRICARE

Defense Health Board Follow Up Review of the Deployment Health Clinical Center

Report
8/29/2013

Report of Defense Health Board Follow Up Review of the Deployment Health Clinical Center

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Health Readiness Support

Evaluation of the TRICARE Program Fiscal Year 2013 Report to Congress

Report
2/28/2013

The Evaluation of the TRICARE Program: Access, Cost, and Quality, Fiscal Year 2013 Report to Congress is provided by the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA)/Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO)—Defense Health Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (DHCAPE), in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) (OASD/HA).This evaluation report presents results trended over at least the most recent three fiscal years, where programs are mature and data permit. MHS cost, quality, and access data are compared with corresponding comparable civilian benchmarks, such as comparing beneficiary-reported access and experience to results from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), comparing our quality measures to the national expectations and results of the Joint Commission, and comparing healthrisky behavior to Healthy People 2020 objectives.

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program

Defense Health Board Annual Review of Department of Defense Deployment Health Centers

Report
3/19/2012

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety

Evaluation of the TRICARE Program

Report
2/28/2012

Fiscal Year 2012 Report to Congress

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program

Evaluation of the TRICARE Program Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress

Report
2/28/2011

Section 717 of the FY 1996 NDAA (PL 104-106)

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program

Evaluation of the TRICARE Program Fiscal Year 2010 Report to Congress

Report
2/28/2010

The Evaluation of the TRICARE Program Fiscal Year 2010 Report to Congress is provided by: The TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), Health Program Analysis and Evaluation Directorate (TMA/ HPA&E), in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) (OASD/HA). This report presents data for each of our four mission elements or strategic objectives: (1) maintaining casualty care and humanitarian assistance, (2) creating and sustaining a healthy, fit, and protected force, (3) promoting healthy and resilient individuals, families, and communities, and (4) improving education, training, and research. As in prior annual reports, where feasible and appropriate, data are trended over the most recent three fiscal years (usually FYs 2007–2009, in this year’s report), where programs are sufficiently mature. Where available and appropriate, we also continue the approach used in past years of comparing TRICARE with civiliansector benchmarks, such as in our beneficiary surveys of access and satisfaction.

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program

Design Plans for Walter Reed and Fort Belvoir

Report
5/1/2009

Defense Health Board: Design Plans for Walter Reed and Fort Belvoir

Recommended Content:

Access, Cost, Quality, and Safety | Research and Innovation
<< < ... 6 7 8 > >> 
Showing results 91 - 105 Page 7 of 8

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.