9 Military Hospitals Receive Highest Leapfrog Grade for Safe, High-Quality Care

Image of 9 Military Hospitals Receive Highest Leapfrog Grade for Safe, High-Quality Care. Hospital Corpsman 3rd Class Lyndon Acosta, left, a surgical technician at Naval Hospital Jacksonville in Florida, prepares surgery sutures during a total hysterectomy procedure at the hospital. (U.S. Navy photo by Jacob Sippel)

The Defense Health Agency announced May 1, 2024, that nine military hospitals received an “A” Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade, demonstrating DHA’s commitment to safe, high-quality health care, and transparency.

The Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade is a letter-grade program that focuses exclusively on a hospital’s patient safety measures through more than 30 national performance indicators. Each indicator reflects errors, accidents, injuries, and infections, as well as the systems hospitals have in place to prevent patient harm. This enables all hospitals, including military, to publicly report their progress in quality and safety.

The Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade program is run by the Leapfrog Group, a national nonprofit watchdog that advocates for improved patient safety in health care. The program is peer-reviewed, fully transparent, and free to the public.

Leapfrog released the spring 2024 hospital safety grades this week.

“We commend all of our health care teams for their unwavering commitment to high reliability and excellence.” said Dr. Paul Cordts, the chief medical officer for DHA.

DHA is the first federal health system to participate in the Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade program. Currently, all military inpatient hospitals and clinics track and report areas that are surveyed in the program.

“We’re humbled at everyone’s enthusiastic participation across our health care system,” said Cordts, who also serves as DHA’s deputy assistant director for medical affairs responsible for clinical quality and patient safety. “The quality and safety assurance measures and improvement initiatives that are in place ensure that we’re providing the best care possible for our beneficiaries.”

The nine hospitals that received an “A” grade are:

Quality, Patient Safety, and Access Information for Patients

It’s easy to find information on how military hospitals and clinics are performing. At the Quality, Patient Safety and Access hub, beneficiaries can find data showing how military medical facilities score on industry standard measures for patient safety, health care outcomes, quality of care, patient satisfaction, and access to care.

At the transparency hub, Department of Defense beneficiaries can compare external records from the Leapfrog Group for health care safety and quality in its Hospital Safety Grade Program, and:

This electronic open archive provides users with the ability to review their chosen military hospital or clinic across the three organizations with clear data showing how the facilities score on industry standard measures for patient safety, health care outcomes, quality of care, patient satisfaction, and access to care.

For example, you can specify a military hospital or clinic by name and review data on patient access to care and patient satisfaction reviews, quality of care, and patient safety information. You can also view overall ratings, which summarize dozens of core quality measures, and download data sheets. A feature of the transparency tool is the ability to compare up to three facilities in a geographic area at once.

Three other external national quality registries that rate military hospitals and clinics highly include the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, National Perinatal Information Center, and the Health Employer Data Information System.

As another measure of transparency, each year the DHA publicly releases a comprehensive report detailing how the system is meeting the standards set for quality, safety, and patient satisfaction.

Titled “Annual Evaluation of the TRICARE Program,” at over 200 pages, it provides in-depth data that reflect the current state of the Military Health System with in-depth reviews and analysis covering quality of care, patient trends, hospital and clinic ratings, and patient safety statistics. It also provides population statistics, TRICARE plan enrollment data, and a financial breakdown of the DOD’s medical programs. The report, required by law, is distributed to Congress and other stakeholders and is publicly available.

Cordts underscored the significance of this safety grade.

“We are extremely proud of this recognition and celebrate these accomplishments because it shows we are doing the best job we can to take care of our beneficiaries,” Cordts said.

You also may be interested in...

Policy
Mar 17, 2015

Instruction: #44-102, Medical Care Management

This instruction implements Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 44-1, Medical Operations, and provides guidance for the organization and delivery of medical care. It implements various publications of Department of Defense (DoD), recognized professional organizations, the Joint Commission (TJC), the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care ...

  • Identification #: 44-102
  • Type: Instruction
Policy
Jan 21, 2015

Federal Regulation: #MEDCOM Regulation 40-28, Medical Services Surgical Counts

This regulation provides guidelines for accountability of items used during operative and other invasive procedures (inclusive of minimally invasive procedures) to ensure they are not retained in a patient. This regulation addresses which items will, at a minimum, be counted, as well as when, how, and by whom the surgical count will be performed.

  • Identification #: MEDCOM Regulation 40-28
  • Type: Federal Regulation
Technical Document
Dec 17, 2014

Patient Safety Order Materials FAQs

.PDF | 363.04 KB

This DoD Patient Safety Program document outlines the frequently asked questions in reference to ordering patient safety materials from the Patient Safety portion of the Health.mil website. The document includes vital contact information for assistance and account registration information.

Technical Document
Apr 2, 2014

Sustainment Guide for Reducing Harm Associated with Patient Falls

.PDF | 428.63 KB

This Falls Sustainment Guide supports the 2012 - 2013 Military Health System (MHS) Partnership for Patients initiative to improve the quality and safety of health care in all Department of Defense (DoD) Medical Treatment Facilities (MTF). The purpose of this Falls Sustainment Guide is to provide the tools and resources to ensure a reduction in falls ...

Technical Document
Feb 13, 2014

Implementation Guide for Readmissions

.PDF | 535.67 KB

The Readmissions Implementation Guide is one of 10 harm-specific guides designed to assist you as you implement identified evidence-based practices to improve patient care.

Technical Document
Feb 11, 2014

Implementation Guide for Falls

.PDF | 641.27 KB

The Falls Implementation Guide was created to support the Partnership for Patients, a national initiative sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services to reduce harm in health care facilities.

Technical Document
Jan 24, 2014

Sustainment Guide for Adverse Drug Events

.PDF | 623.35 KB

The lessons learned through the Military Health System (MHS) Adverse Drug Event (ADE) implementation process have led to the development of an improved Sustainment Guide. This sustainment guide includes the elimination of monitoring the therapeutic class of Sedatives, implementing processes to improve the integrity of data, clarification of ...

Technical Document
Feb 14, 2013

Implementation Guide for Venous Thromboembolism

.PDF | 552.81 KB

The Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Implementation Guide is one of 10 harm-specific guides designed to assist you as you implement identified evidence-based practices to improve patient care.

Refine your search