Skip main navigation

Military Health System

Clear Your Cache

Health.mil has undergone a recent update. For the best user experience we recommend clearing your browser cache.

Injury Investigations of Unique Military Populations Enhance Force Strength

Image of Injury Investigations of Unique Military Populations Enhance Force Strength. According to U.S. Defense Health Agency-Public Health experts, noncombat-related injuries are the primary reason active duty service members seek medical treatment. Department of Defense active duty service members require medical treatment for injuries almost 5 million times each year. In addition to causing pain, injuries often lead to physical restrictions and medical profiles. As a result, injuries degrade force readiness through millions of lost duty and training days and billions of dollars annually.

According to U.S. Defense Health Agency-Public Health experts, noncombat-related injuries are the primary reason active duty service members seek medical treatment.

Department of Defense active duty service members require medical treatment for injuries almost 5 million times each year. In addition to causing pain, injuries often lead to physical restrictions and medical profiles. As a result, injuries degrade force readiness through millions of lost duty and training days and billions of dollars annually.

How Do We Know the Extent of the DOD Injury Problem?

To identify reasons for medical visits, military health experts routinely monitor the medical data of all service members, an essential public health service also referred to as health surveillance. Surveillance allows the military to monitor health care use and trends over time and in useful groups, such as at the installation level. For example, across all services, there are more than twice as many medical visits for injury as for behavioral and mental health, the second-most common reason for visits.

The DOD’s routine surveillance provides insights to the nature of the injury visits as well as evidence to support strategic injury reduction priorities. Surveillance, however, is not always adequate to identify the unique types of injuries, injury patterns, hazards, exposures, or characteristics of individual units.

Commanders and public health personnel may need additional targeted injury investigations to identify risk factors for specific groups.

What Are Injury Investigations?

“Injury investigations require our experts to go beyond the medical records used for routine surveillance,” said Michelle Chervak, chief of the military injury prevention division of DHA-PH in Aberdeen, Maryland. “Additional information pertaining to a specific type of injury in a ‘sub-population,’ or unit of interest, is collected using a variety of techniques, including questionnaires, focus groups or interviews, and in-depth reviews of recent scientific publications.”

A variety of units benefit from the extensive specialized assessment. In addition to the investigations mentioned below, other examples of military unit sub-populations that have been investigated include military police, infantry units, U.S. Army wheeled vehicle mechanics, hospital medical staff, a chemical brigade, and even military working dogs.

“During investigations, we gather information about a unit’s specific mission and training schedule,” said Chervak. “Some characteristics, such as higher body fat and lower aerobic fitness, tend to be associated with musculoskeletal injury risk for all military members. Risks that may be specific to this population include occupational demands, training requirements, and health behaviors such as tobacco use, sleep, and nutrition. These details are not always available in medical records or other centralized data sources.”

Injury investigations involve comprehensive data collection and statistical analyses that can take time to complete, but interim findings can often be provided at multiple stages.

The following are examples of recent and ongoing investigations.

MSK Injuries Among U.S. Military Paratroopers, 2019 and 2023

Changes in tactical paratrooper procedures, most notably the implementation of a new parachute known as the T-11 after 2015, resulted in a two-phase investigation of paratrooper injuries.

The first phase focused on a comprehensive review of the available literature. The second phase compared medical injury data of active paratroopers with groups of peers who did not parachute.

“We realized that many past studies had been performed on service members who were in training, or ’jump school,’” says Chervak. “So we identified different patterns of injuries and risk variation between the trainees and those who went on to become active paratroopers in a military unit.”

The comparison with nonparatroopers also provided a new understanding of injury risks among U.S. military paratroopers.

“Most injuries experienced by paratroopers were overuse injuries, which is similar to nonparatroopers,” said Chervak. “While findings showed paratroopers do experience a slightly higher risk of acute traumatic injuries, there appear to be fewer ankle fractures and sprains than in past studies. We also found that paratroopers appear to experience slightly more shoulder-related injuries than their nonparatrooper peers.”

The DHA has summarized the current evidence in a factsheet.

Musculoskeletal Injuries Among U.S. Army Band Members, 2023

“We conducted an investigation of members of the Army Band at the request of their command, who felt band members may have different musculoskeletal, or MSK, injuries than other Army populations given the units’ older average age and unique occupational activities,” said Anna Renner, a safety engineer and senior injury prevention investigator at DHA-PH in Aberdeen, Maryland. “Extended sitting, standing, and marching for rehearsals and performances; awkward postures while playing instruments; and carrying heavy instruments or equipment are all unique risk factors for MSK injuries among musicians.”

Data on these risk factors were collected using an electronic self-reported questionnaire. Common factors such as body mass index and fitness levels were assessed against self-reported injuries

“Based on our findings, we recommended increased physical training, additional rest breaks during rehearsals, and ergonomic assessments to ensure proper postures are maintained,” said Renner.

Hearing Injuries Among Special Operations Forces, Ongoing

While all service members are at risk for experiencing auditory damage, the risks of hearing-related injury are considered especially high for those in special operations forces, or SOF, due to noise exposure from firing weapons. A military public health investigation is underway to assess SOF hearing risk.

“The SOF personnel likely have greater risk of hearing damage than those of a typical soldier because they are trained on a wider variety of heavy weapon systems, use weapons more regularly in training, and remain in a front-line combat role longer than other service members,” said Alyssa Davidson, a research audiologist with Walter Reed National Military Medical Center supporting the DHA’s investigation.

Davidson explains the investigation allows audiologists to evaluate hearing and auditory function of SOF service members before, during and after training exercises to identify any acute changes in hearing function.

“We will compare any hearing changes to the exposure data collected with minimally-invasive blast dosimeters and boothless audiometers,” said Davidson.

When complete, the study findings will assist SOF leaders with recommendations to reduce risks of hearing impairment among their units. The same type of evaluation can be extended to other units.

“Now that we have an established protocol, we are interested in working with other units concerned about noise and blast exposure in their trainings,” said Davidson.

Like the other injury investigations, this study is evaluating exposures that cause hearing- related injuries and hearing loss. The noise and blast exposure data being collected for this study may also have even broader implications and help inform the Warfighter Brain Health initiative to counter blast overpressure risk

Learn More

As evidenced by these examples, injury prevention investigations can assist local leaders in developing injury prevention strategies in their unique populations.

Local leaders and public health personnel with concerns about their unit’s injuries and risks can reach out to the military’s public health injury specialists and by filling in basic contact and topic information as a Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen mission request.

The Defense Health Agency supports our Nation by improving health and building readiness—making extraordinary experiences ordinary and exceptional outcomes routine.

NOTE: The mention of any non-federal entity and/or its products is for informational purposes only, and is not to be construed or interpreted, in any manner, as federal endorsement of that non-federal entity or its products.

You also may be interested in...

Policy
Sep 11, 2015

Instruction: #DODI 6490.13, Comprehensive Policy on Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Neurocognitive Assessments by the Military Services

This instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes standard elements, pursuant to section 722 of Public Law 111-383, requiring the implementation of a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment policy in the military services.

  • Identification #: DODI 6490.13
  • Type: Instruction
Policy
Oct 31, 2014

Memorandum: Pre-Deployment, Deployment, and Post-Deployment Training, Screening, and Monitoring Guidance for Department of Defense Personnel Deployed to Ebola Outbreak Areas

.PDF | 8.96 MB

Department of Defense personnel (Service members and civilian employees)deployed to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defined Ebola outbreak areas will complete pre and post-deployment screening and training requirements outlined in this memorandum and supplemented by United States Africa Command (USAFRICOM) guidance.

  • Identification #: N/A
  • Type: Memorandum
Policy
Oct 20, 2014

Memorandum: #13-006, Addendum to Guidance on the Establishment of Department of Defense Standardization for Ordering and Procurement of Hearing Devices Prostheses 13-006

.PDF | 94.68 KB

This memorandum clarifies procedures relating to Health Affairs' "Guidance on the Establishment of Department of Defense Standardization for Ordering and Procurement of Hearing Devices/Prosthesis," dated August 15, 2013, which remains in effect.

  • Identification #: 13-006
  • Type: Memorandum
Policy
Apr 28, 2014

Instruction: #DODI 1010.10, Health Promotion and Disease Prevention

This instruction reissues DOD Directive 1010.10 (Reference (a)) as a DOD instruction (DoDI) in accordance with the authority in DODD 5124.02 (Reference (b)) to establish policy and assign responsibilities for health promotion and disease prevention in accordance with References (c) through (f).

  • Identification #: DODI 1010.10
  • Type: Instruction
Policy
Sep 18, 2012

Instruction: #DODI 6490.11, DOD Policy Guidance for Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Concussion in the Deployed Setting

This instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures on the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), also known as concussion, in the deployed setting.

  • Identification #: DODI 6490.11
  • Type: Instruction
Policy
Apr 20, 2012

Memorandum: Guideline for Tuberculosis Screening and Testing

.PDF | 119.55 KB

Because accessions come from widely diverse geographic backgrounds, the Services should determine the need for tuberculin skin tests for accessions while Service members are at the training base, based on the needs of the specific accessions environment and operational mission requirements. DOD will implement targeted testing rather than universal ...

  • Identification #: N/A
  • Type: Memorandum
Policy
May 11, 2011

Instruction: DCoE Clinical Recommendations Post Injury NCAT

.PDF | 252.30 KB

In accordance with Section 1673 of the NDAA HR 4986, signed into law in January of 2008, the Secretary of Defense was instructed to establish a protocol for the pre-deployment assessment and documentation of the cognitive functioning of Service Members deployed outside the United States. In advance of definitive evidence of superiority for any single ...

  • Identification #: N/A
  • Type: Instruction
Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search
Last Updated: February 25, 2025
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on X Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery